Updated 

California gaming regulators say no to Galaxy Gaming, CEO


The California Gambling Control Commission on Thursday unanimously upheld a judge’s ruling that deemed Galaxy Gaming California LLC, a subsidiary of Las Vegas-based Galaxy Gaming Inc., and CEO Robert Saucier unsuitable to do business in California.

Since it involved litigation, the four-member gaming commission voted in closed session, a commission spokeswoman said. The commission declined to comment on the ruling.

Both Galaxy and Saucier had sub­mitted applications for a finding of suitability to supply Native American casinos in California with casino products. Galaxy manufactures table games, as well as TableMAX, an automated table game that offers blackjack without a live dealer.

In a 103-page decision in April, Administrative Law Judge Catherine Frink in Sacramento wrote, “Cause exists to deny both applicants.”

Frink said both Galaxy Gaming and Saucier provided untrue or misleading information. Saucier also is accused of inking licensing deals with several California Indian casinos, collecting about $2,000 a month from each in licensing fees, without commission approval.

Frink’s recommendation stems from a three-year investigation of business license applications by Saucier. Messages left with Saucier Thursday were not returned.

Frink said Saucier “engaged in activities that created the danger of un­suitable, unfair or illegal practices.”

Nevada gaming regulators investigated Galaxy when the company received a license in 2010 but found no problems.

The decision by California regulators comes four days after Galaxy Gaming announced a deal to install games for Harrah’s Cherokee Casino Resort east of Asheville, N.C.

Galaxy Gaming has operated in California since 1999 without incident, according to the judge’s ruling. But Frink said company officials “ignored the fact that those entities have been able to do so, in large part, because of (their) own dilatory tactics during the application and appeal process.”

Contact reporter Chris Sieroty at csieroty@reviewjournal .com or 702-477-3893. Follow @sierotyfeatures on Twitter.

 

Comment section guidelines

The below comment section contains thoughts and opinions from users that in no way represent the views of the Las Vegas Review-Journal or GateHouse Media. This public platform is intended to provide a forum for users of reviewjournal.com to share ideas, express thoughtful opinions and carry the conversation beyond the article. Users must follow the guidelines under our Commenting Policy and are encouraged to use the moderation tools to help maintain civility and keep discussions on topic.