You didn’t really think conservative activist Chuck Muth could resist jousting with a critic, did you?
Well, he hasn’t. After being taken to task for GOP activist Nathan Taylor in yesterday’s blog, Muth jogged his own memory of their political relationship.
Here’s the response:
“Nathan who? Oh, wait. I remember that little whelp.
“As a wet-behind-the-ears Eddie Haskell wannabe, I paid to send Li'l Nate to a Campaign Management School in Washington, DC, about a dozen years ago - something I've done for a number of Nevada GOP activists over the years. But at the last minute, Li'l Nate apparently got a bad case of the jitters over the thought of a sleep-over in our nation's capital without his Teddy Bear, so he backed out of the trip and said he pretty much knew it all already anyway.
“I'd forgotten about Li'l Nate because he dropped out of sight a few years back and, well, he was never that relevant anyway. I wonder why did the young whippersnapper bowed out of politics and crawled back under his rock? Oh, wait, yeah, now I remember. Thanks, Google!
“Nevada's chapter of the Young Republicans has basically imploded, leaving its chairman with up to $25,000 in personal debt and allegations that he mishandled money," reported Kirsten Searer back in July 2005. "All but three people have resigned from the statewide group, but the fallout could prove increasingly embarrassing to the entire state Republican Party. Today, the chairman of the group, Reno resident Nathan Taylor, plans to hold a press conference attacking three of the state's party leaders -- Sen. John Ensign, Rep. Jim Gibbons and Rep. Jon Porter.’
“Seems Li'l Nate was for party infighting before he was against it. How typical.
“And for the record, I didn't "switch parties." I went "independent," like Nevada. I no longer belong to any political party. Then again, Li'l Nate always did have a little trouble with things like facts and the truth.”
With that, Muth ended his response.
I think this is the part where the referee steps in and stops the fight on cuts.