CES: New Palm looks good, but there's a huge hurdle to clear

Palm this morning unveiled their new operating system and a slick new handset to go with it. On first glance, it looks like something I'd like to carry and make my mobile hub. On further inspection, however, there's a big "Oh, No!" moment that quickly followed.

The launch partner for the new Palm Pre (the "e" has the obligatory bar above it, signifying a "long e") is Sprint. I don't care how cool the thing is, I won't be changing carriers to become an early adopter. I'll wait for the GSM version that will work on the AT&T network, thankyouverymuch.

Sprint CEO Dan Hesse joined the braintrust of Palm to announce the new, feature-packed "phone" that I think has the potential to give iPhone a run for their money. The new Palm Web Operating System, along with it's slide-down full QWERTY keyboard, ability to run multiple applications simultaneously and a bevvy of other features make the Pre the hot item of CES - for me at least.

If Palm really wanted to be innovative, they would have launched the Pre on all carriers at once. By forcing folks to a particular carrier -- no matter how good, or weak -- they do a disservice to the consumer. I know now how the non-AT&T customers felt when the iPhone was launched. Even though I still don't carry an iPhone, I know that I can make the change at any time.

For the record, the smartphone that hangs on my belt is a Palm Treo 680. I've used Palm devices for at least 10 years and have had every version of the Treo. I want to stick with Palm. I want the new Pre. I want it on AT&T. I want it now.

Since the device won't be available until "sometime in the first half of the year," I'll most likely be sticking with my Treo 680 for a while longer. Maybe Sprint will make me an offer I can't say "no" to. Chances are, though, that I'll be waiting at least a year for the Pre that fits MY needs.

You can read more about the Pre at the Palm site (http://www.palm.com/us), provided you can get there. My browser couldn't complete the connection, so be patient.

Comment section guidelines

The below comment section contains thoughts and opinions from users that in no way represent the views of the Las Vegas Review-Journal. This public platform is intended to provide a forum for users of reviewjournal.com to share ideas, express thoughtful opinions and carry the conversation beyond the article. Users must follow the guidelines under our Commenting Policy and are encouraged to use the moderation tools to help maintain civility and keep discussions on topic.

View Comments