If you like watching politicians squirm, it just doesn't get much better than this.
After the Democratic Party chiefs tolerated sexual hound dogs like Bill Clinton and shushed up any criticism of the former president coming back as a senior statesman to the party, there's now great frustration that sex pervs like Anthony Weiner are using the Bill and Hillary example for their own path back to elected office.
Weiner and his campaign are comparing the multiple "sexting" of his penis and his wife's forgiveness of him for doing so, to the Clinton's White House escapade that stained both the presidency and the Oval Office's carpet.
According to the N.Y. Post this morning, "The Clintons are pissed off that Weiner's campaign is saying that Huma is just like Hillary," a source said. "How dare they compare Huma with Hillary? Hillary was the first lady. Hillary was a senator. She was the secretary of state."
I don't know. I understand the angst of Hillary and her folks. But, really, what's the difference between what she did throughout her marriage to Bill Clinton the sexual predator and what Huma is doing in her marriage to Anthony Weiner the sexual pervert?
I am ready to be enlightened. Someone please tell me the difference.
PS: Be sure to read my Sunday newspaper column on why the Democratic Party allows all these pervs to go unchallenged within their party.