

![]() |
Monday, January 20, 1997
Welfare hot issue for stateLawmakers and Gov. Bob Miller face difficult questions in carrying out reform mandated by Congress. | |
|
By Jane Ann Morrison Review-Journal
Senate Majority Leader Bill Raggio believes the top issue facing the Legislature as it opens today -- besides the budget, always lawmakers' biggest challenge -- is welfare reform. |
"We've started to collect the statistical data, but can't tell yet what the impact on the county will be," Davis said. All the counties are worried about the impact of the federal welfare bill, said Robert Hadfield, executive director of the Nevada Association of Counties. He is having a bill drafted to say counties would not have to care for those who formerly qualified for welfare programs. The "hold harmless" legislation is needed to protect the counties' financial position, he said. "From the county perspective, we're the safety net. We serve those people while they see if they qualify for other programs under new plans. But we may have a lot of people coming to the counties for help. And we don't have the financial resources to address this problem," Hadfield said. So where would these people turn? "Depending on how welfare reform is enacted, some may not be effected, but there may be a large number of people who don't know where to go," he said. "But our position is that we cannot be asked to absorb a pass-through of clients that were previously served by the state of Nevada." Florence said the federal dollars have always gone to the state, then directly to the recipient, and that none of the federal block grant money can go to the counties. "The counties may make a case to the Legislature that they're going to be burdened and get a state appropriation," she suggested. Hadfield said Nevada's 17 counties -- which don't have the same needs and standards when it comes to welfare -- don't feel it's a good solution to run to the Legislature for money. "We'd like to address the problem initially, rather than seek bailout money," he said. The association hasn't taken a unified position on issues such as family caps and legal immigrants. Whatever welfare program is ultimately crafted, Hadfield said the real test of the state's welfare reform won't come until something happens that nobody wants. "It won't truly be tested until such time as the economy takes a downturn," Hadfield said, noting that's when more people lose their jobs and apply for welfare. Jan Gilbert, Northern Nevada coordinator of the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada, plans to lobby lawmakers to pass more humane welfare laws. She also served on a welfare task force and said that during hearings, all the welfare mothers who came to testify supported drug testing, saying it would help dissolve their image as drug users. However, testing everyone would be costly and would waste dollars that could be better used. "I don't think it's going to happen because of the expense," Gilbert said. She anticipates the biggest battle will be over family caps. Sen. Maurice Washington, R-Reno, is returning with another bill to continue his fight for tougher welfare laws. He failed in his attempt two years ago to pass a law that would have placed a two-year limit on welfare payments and denied cash benefits to children conceived after their mothers start receiving welfare. Benefits also would have been cut for children who didn't make progress in school. His proposal was dubbed punitive by Assembly Democrats and defended by Senate Republicans as a sensible approach. Gilbert said one of the biggest problems the state faces is determining who qualifies as an exemption to the federal work requirements. The heart of the federal bill requires able-bodied adults to work after two years on welfare and limits lifetime welfare assistance to five years. For example, Gilbert said she heard of a man who was a caretaker for his wife, and the state told him he had to get a job. He said that if he got a 20-hour-a-week job, his wife would die, she said. And what about the mother who doesn't work so she can care for her paraplegic child? Must she work or lose benefits? "Until we iron out the problems, we're going to face a lot of catastrophic problems with people being hurt," Gilbert said. |
|
[News]
[Sports]
[Business]
[Lifestyles]
[Neon]
[Opinion]
[in-depth] [Classifieds] [Help/About] [Home] [Archive] [Current Edition] | ||
[an error occurred while processing this directive]