[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Las Vegas Review-JournalDonrey Newspapers
Review-Journal Online
HOME PAGE

HEADLINES
SECTIONS
NEWS
SPORTS
   Betting Line
BUSINESS
LIFESTYLES
NEON
   Dining
   Showguide
   Nightlife
   Movies
   TV Listings
OPINION
   Columnists
OBITUARIES
CLASSIFIEDS
   Auto Guide
WEATHER
REAL ESTATE
Subscribe to the RJ
  Archive
Fun Stuff
  Crosswords
  Kids Area
  Gallery
Extras
  Newspaper Subscription
  Contact Us
Wednesday, April 19, 2000
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

Calling collect costly for inmates, families

A group says prisoners are paying for prison system's change of long-distance provider.

By J.M. Kalil
Review-Journal

      Crime doesn't pay, and it's certainly costing prisoners' friends and families a little more than they expected this month.
      After the Nevada Department of Prisons changed long-distance service providers at a Jean prison two weeks ago, inmates' families say their phone bills are rising because of exorbitant pricing.
      Prisoners' families and members of Nevada CURE, a prison rights advocacy group, say the state changed long-distance companies to make more money from the lucrative profit-sharing clause in the state's contract, under which the Nevada Department of Prisons receives about half of all revenues from inmates' collect calls.
      "The state is trying to make money off inmates calling their families and loved ones," said Donald Hinton, whose son is incarcerated in Southern Nevada Correctional Center in Jean, the first penitentiary to switch service on April 5. Other Nevada prisons are in the process of transferring service from Sprint to MCI, the carrier that was awarded the exclusive phone service contract Feb. 8.
      "The rate of return that goes back to the prison is certainly a part of how it's awarded," said John Slansky, a Nevada prisons assistant director.
      According to a March 17 memorandum sent to the Nevada Legislature's Interim Finance Committee, the Department of Prisons made more than $2.5 million during fiscal year 1999 on inmate phone calls. During the first half of fiscal year 2000, from July 1999 to January 2000, the state made more than $1.5 million.
      But Lana McGaffin, chief of purchasing for Nevada prisons, says the amount the state receives was not the overriding factor in awarding the contract. She said the MCI contract returns a smaller rate of return, at about 49 to 50 percent.
      Prison officials say they have received complaints about the new service, but said rates could increase only a very small amount because prison phone service rates are regulated by the Nevada Public Utilities Commission.
      But a PUC spokesman said phone companies have more freedom when determining rates for inmates.
      "Prison phones have a lot more latitude in how much they charge than other forms of telephone regulation," said Barry Holt, a senior consumer representative at the PUC. He said the commission has more control over rates charged by local providers in Las Vegas than with companies providing service at prisons. "Plus, once a prisoner calls over state lines, we can no longer regulate what's being charged."
      Holt says the telecommunications industry is "bending over backwards" to have the prison phone system deregulated so long-distance providers' rates will not be set by state agencies.
      "Lots of relatives were at the prison last weekend telling (inmates), `Don't call me anymore,' " said Kim Bakken, whose husband has been incarcerated for two years at the Southern Nevada Correctional Center. "It just costs too much now."
      Bakken says calls from her husband were blocked after she unknowingly ran up $191 worth of collect long-distance charges in less than 10 days. She spent six hours on the phone with MCI representatives trying to determine what rate she was being charged. A customer service representative told her calls from the Jean prison, about 45 miles southwest of Las Vegas, averaged $16 for every 15 minutes, Bakken said.
      The debate surrounding state prison systems making money off inmate calls gained national attention last month when a coalition of black community leaders in New York called for a boycott of MCI. They said the nation's second-largest long-distance provider was causing an undue burden on families of black Empire State prisoners by charging rates higher than nonprison collect service.
      In New York, MCI pays 60 percent of its revenue from inmate calls to the state.
      "Phone service is a lot more expensive to operate out of a prison," said Dan Davie, a Washington, D.C., spokesman for MCI. "The money also goes back to the inmates through the prison system for programs like AIDS awareness education and transportation for inmates' families to the prison."
      According to Nevada CURE Director Mercedes Maharis, a petition circulating in the Jean penitentiary protesting the new phone service had 300 prisoners' signatures by Tuesday evening.
      A Review-Journal request to interview several inmates who are upset with the new service was denied by warden Rick Walker. He said requests to speak with inmates had to be cleared through Assistant Director John Slansky. After saying he would investigate granting interview requests for two prisoners, Slansky did not return phone calls Tuesday afternoon.


E-mail this story to a friend:
Your friend's e-mail address:

Your e-mail address:


Give us your FEEDBACK on this or any story.

BEST OF LAS VEGAS

Fill out our Online Readers' Poll
Printable version of this story

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[News] [Sports] [Business] [Lifestyles] [Neon] [Opinion] [in-depth]
[Columnists] [Help/About] [Archive] [Community Link] [Current Edition]
[Classifieds] [Real Estate] [TV] [Weather]
[EMAIL] [SEARCH] [HOME]
Brought to you by the Las Vegas Review-Journal.   Nevada's largest daily newspaper.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]