Home Subscribe
Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo
.
Member Center

Recent Editions
WThFSSuMT
>> Search the site
.
.
.
.
NEWS
.
.
.
.
.
.
.


Sunday, July 25, 2004
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

PRESIDENTIAL POLL: Race in Nevada a tossup

Nader factor and Yucca Mountain could tip scales in Silver State

By ERIN NEFF
REVIEW-JOURNAL



Click image for enlargement.



Click image for enlargement.



Click image for enlargement.

The presidential race in Nevada has tightened significantly and is beginning to reflect its national status as a battleground, according to a statewide poll of likely voters conducted for the Review-Journal and reviewjournal.com.

The Republican ticket of George Bush and Dick Cheney led the Democratic ticket of John Kerry and John Edwards 46 percent to 43 percent. Seven percent were undecided, and 4 percent went for Ralph Nader, heading the independent ticket.

That's significantly closer than a similar poll conducted in March, which showed Bush up 49 percent to 38 percent over Kerry with 9 percent undecided.

The poll of 625 voters was conducted from Tuesday to Thursday by Washington, D.C.-based Mason-Dixon Polling & Research. The margin of error is plus or minus 4 percentage points.

If Nevadans could bet the election in sports books, pollster Brad Coker said, "the odds would be dead even."

Some factors that could tip the state for Bush include Nevada's strong economy and Nader's potential to take votes away from Kerry. But Kerry could nullify Bush's edge on those fronts as a result of the Yucca Mountain issue, the poll suggests.

Voters were asked whether Bush's approval of Yucca Mountain as the nation's nuclear waste repository would make them more likely or less likely to vote for him, or if it would have no influence in their decision.

Statewide, a majority of voters said it would have no impact on their presidential vote. But among undecided voters, 31 percent said they would be less likely to vote for Bush because of his Yucca Mountain decision.

"Yucca really kind of jumps out as an issue," Coker said. "It could be the Achilles' heel for Bush because amongst that little group of undecided voters, by about a 3-to-1 margin, it's working against him."

Rebecca Lambe, executive director of the Nevada Democratic Party, said she believes Yucca Mountain will make a difference this November.

"This is a situation where you had a presidential candidate who said one thing and turned around and did another," Lambe said, adding that when Yucca is framed alongside issues of the war, job losses and the uninsured, the state will go for Kerry.

Kerry voted consistently against Yucca Mountain in the Senate and has vowed to halt the project if he is elected.

Nevada Attorney General Brian Sandoval, who is co-chairing Bush's re-election campaign in the Silver State, said he doesn't think Yucca Mountain will make a difference.

"The president is on record and we're on record," Sandoval said. "The president is going to wait and see what happens (in court) and we'll agree to disagree on that issue."

Bush-Cheney spokeswoman Tracey Schmitt said the campaign believes the election is about two issues: strengthening the economy and winning the war on terrorism.

What Yucca could do to Bush, Nader could do to Kerry.

Steve Wark, a Republican political consultant who said he aided the effort to get Nader on the ballot in Nevada, said he thinks Nader can help the president.

"Any third party candidate with appeal to an electorate will garner some votes in the general election and most of the votes that Ralph Nader will garner will come from Democrat leaning voters," Wark said.

Lambe said Democrats will realize that "a vote for Nader is a vote for Bush."

Coker said he believed the race in Nevada probably will lean more to Kerry after this week's Democratic National Convention and could even out again after the Republican National Convention in late August.

Kerry's climb in the poll since March shows the presumptive Democratic nominee withstood "that first big wave of attack ads," Coker said. The Bush campaign was advertising heavily in Nevada around the time of the March poll.

Coker also said Kerry gained from increased public concerns about the war in Iraq and from his selection of Edwards as his running mate.

The same poll showed 46 percent of voters recognize Bush favorably, compared to 40 percent unfavorably. Kerry's recognition is split in thirds between favorable, unfavorable and neutral. Nader is recognized favorably by 19 percent compared to 45 percent unfavorable.

Bush is supported more by men, while Kerry gets more support from women. The breakdown in counties statewide falls along voter registration with Kerry winning in Clark, Bush winning in Washoe and Bush winning decisively in rural Nevada.

The Kerry campaign was "elated" with the poll, said Sean Smith, Nevada spokesman for Kerry. He said the numbers show Kerry within range of putting the state back into the so-called blue column, after Bush's 3.5 percentage point margin of victory in Nevada in 2000.

"We're in a dead heat with him after we were down 11 points in March," Smith said. "We haven't even had our convention yet."

Schmitt said the Bush-Cheney campaign "always anticipated a close race."

"The polls are where we thought we'd be," she said.

Asked why Kerry has improved in the Nevada poll, Schmitt said polls reflect just a snapshot in time "and the last few months have produced some disturbing images from abroad."





See the complete results


WAR AND TERROR

The war in Iraq and terrorism top the issues on voters' minds as they head to the polls to elect the next president.

A poll of 625 statewide voters by Mason-Dixon Polling & Research of Washington, D.C., shows Nevadans are close to split about the decision to go to war in Iraq.

Asked whether "our leaders" made the right decision in going to war, 46 percent agreed, 43 percent said it was a mistake and 11 percent were unsure.

The question fell largely along party lines, with 76 percent of Democrats saying the decision was wrong and 79 percent of Republicans saying it was right.

Independent voters fall with the state average on the Iraq war.

In an NBC poll released Friday, 47 percent say that removing Saddam Hussein from power wasn't worth the number of U.S. casualties and the financial cost of the war, while 43 percent say it was worth it.

In the Review-Journal poll, voters did not heavily prefer any one topic when asked which issue would be most influential in a voting decision in the November election for national office,

The situation in Iraq was viewed as most important by 19 percent and homeland security and the war on terror were the top issue among 15 percent of voters.

The economy and unemployment received 17 percent, health care got 12 percent, and 11 percent chose Social Security and Medicare.

None of the other issues was in double digits. The proposed Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository was not asked as a specific issue.

---
REVIEW-JOURNAL



Advertisement


Contact the R-J | Subscribe | Report a delivery problem | Put the paper on hold | Advertise with us
Report a news tip/press release | Send a letter to the editor | Print the announcement forms | Jobs at the R-J

Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal, 1997 -
Stephens Media   Privacy Statement