Dog euthanization costs Carson City $41,500

CARSON CITY — Carson City super­visors have authorized a $41,500 settlement to avert a lawsuit over city Animal Service’s euthanasia of a dog in July.

The board voted 4-0 on Thursday to approve the payment to Jeraldine Archuleta, owner of the shih tzu named Rollie.

Her lawyer, Cal Dunlap, released a statement praising the city’s action and saying he and Archuleta have “accomplished (their) goals” with the settlement.

The case came to light when Archuleta wrote a letter to the Nevada Appeal explaining that she tried to retrieve her dog from the shelter the day after it was picked up but was told she’d have to pay $100 within 72 hours.

Archuleta said she asked for more time to pay the $100 but was unable to come up with the money fast enough. Rollie was euthanized July 30, five days after it was impounded.

“I cannot believe that the staff at the animal clinic were so uncooperative and not willing to allow me a few days to get the funds together,” Archuleta wrote.

Carson City supervisors concluded that the case would have involved extensive legal work or a trial had a lawsuit been filed, the Appeal reported.

“Thus, the risk of attorney’s fees and costs to litigate this matter would be substantially more than this pre-litigation settlement amount which fairly compensates both claimant and her attorney,” a city document to supervisors states.

Randy Munn, chief deputy district attorney, said that “indisputable facts” in the case included an Animal Services code change in May that allowed for 10-day boarding under protective custody at an owner’s expense of animals under city control.

Under the previous ordinance, there was a 72-hour waiting period before such an animal became city property.

The city also is being sued by the former Animal Services manager who says she was defamed and unfairly ousted from her job because of public outrage over the death.


Rules for posting comments

Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Stephens Media LLC or this newspaper. This is a public forum. Read our guidelines for posting. If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon next to the comment.


Due to an increase in uncivil behavior and dialogue the Review-Journal has temporarily disabled the comment boards. The Review-Journal will use the time to evaluate the effectiveness of the comment boards and find an appropriate time to reintroduce them to