51°F
weather icon Clear

Homeowners say HOA is doing things right

Q: We read your column regularly on Sundays. Nearly all of your responses seem to be to complaints about real or perceived homeowners association board member abuses, unfair charges or fees, covenants, conditions and restrictions questions or infractions, legality of board decisions and the like. Some seem to be very valid concerns, others not so much.

With that, here’s a little change of pace (although we have also had a couple of bouts with the board or the property management company over the 30-plus years we have lived in our development where we raised our three children, including having a portable basketball hoop in the driveway, needing to paint a gate or the eaves, etc.): For the most part our HOA board has done yeoman’s work in keeping our community in decent shape. Our development literally once was the farthest one in the south end of the Las Vegas Valley. So much so that the developer had to build three swimming pools and two tennis courts to attract folks down this way. But once the 215 Beltway and the airport connector tunnel were built, development eventually steamrolled past us and now we are practically in the inner city.

The board has increased our dues for the first time in 30 years, mostly as a result of continued maintenance and needed upkeep of the pools and tennis courts. Our neighborhood, which could have begun to crumble with all the urban pressures that have closed in on us, has not. And we are not a gated community. We have attended a few (too few) meetings, and are impressed with the way in which the board addresses issues, as well as their keeping us informed with periodic emails, and U.S. Postal Service mailings of meeting agendas and electronic newsletters. The board is striving to keep this a nice place to live, where our now-grown kids enjoy coming back with theirs for visits.

A: It is not an easy task serving as a director for an association board. Thanks for the positive feedback.

I’m currently on a committee and have been told repeatedly by management if I get elected to the board of directors I’d have to give up my seat on the committee. However, a new committee has just been formed and two of the members are husband and wife, and the husband is a sitting board member. I don’t know where I can go from here. I look forward to your valuable advice.

You will need to look at your governing documents as Nevada Revised Statutes 116 does not have any regulations concerning committees. Your association may have regulations that a board member may not serve on a committee. This is not an unusual regulation as other associations have the same policy.

What the association cannot do is have two standards, denying you to sit on a committee while allowing another board member to sit on a committee. You need to address this first with the community manager and, if not rectified, at the next board meeting. Send an email to the community manager to place on the board agenda regulations concerning board members serving on committees.

Barbara Holland, CPM is an author, educator, expert witness on real estate issues pertaining to management and brokerage. Questions may be sent to holland744o@gmail.com.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
HOA wants homeowner to remove treehouse

Try to set a meeting with the board to reach some compromise. If the treehouse does not violate the architectural guidelines, it should be approved based upon those documents.

HOA seeks solutions to its homeless problem

Your association should have trespassing signs posted by the entrances to your community. You can advise homeowners to call 311 for assistance with the police department to remove trespassers from the community. You may consider hiring a security service to patrol the community, even if it is just a roving guard that comes through the community during a 24-hour period to remove the transients prior to them calling the police department for assistance.

Best to wait for written approval before starting project

Homeowners should absolutely avoid beginning an architectural project unless they receive written approval from their HOA board. When you don’t receive a formal written approval, unwanted consequences occur.

Condo owner may be restricted with solar panels

Since the roof is “shared” by seven other owner you may be restricted as to the installation of the solar panels.

Cars with expired car registrations becoming a problem

A vehicle cannot be towed solely because the vehicle’s registration has expired. The unregistered vehicle could be towed if there was another regulation that was being violated.

HOA board candidate can have addresses, not names

Under Nevada law, associations must provide a list of the mailing addresses of each unit, which must not include the names of the unit owners or tenants.

Homeowners get HOA fine without notification

Your association should have sent you a courtesy/warning letter that you were in violation. Prior to assessing a fine on your account, your association should have sent you a hearing notice. You can appeal their decision. You should ask the association to waive the fine. Contact the community manager to find out why you were fined without a hearing.

Town home attracts vagrants; HOA not happy

The HOA and police have contacted the owner and his property manager when they have chased vagrants from their unit. However, the owner and property manage are indifferent and have done nothing to properly secure the unit.

New law helps protect homeowners’ private information

In addition to imposing cybersecurity insurance and data protection requirements for homeowners associations’ online assessment payment processors, SB378, which was adopted this session and went into law earlier this year, helps HOA protect homeowners’ private information and streamlines the email notification process.

New law improves online protections for homeowners

Pursuant to SB 378, that was adopted this session and went into law earlier this year, entities processing homeowner payment transactions are now required to maintain a minimum of $5 million dollars in cyber-security insurance “that provides coverage for losses arising out of or relating to data breaches, unauthorized intrusions into an information system, computer viruses, ransomware, identity theft and similar exposures.”