53°F
weather icon Drizzle
app-logo
RJ App
Vegas News, Alerts, ePaper

Odors have high-rise condo owner seeking solutions

Q: I live in a high-rise condo in Las Vegas. I have a problem where modifications were made to the apartment adjoining mine and construction defects are causing odors to be sent into my apartment. The original construction time frame was 2000-2001.

The homeowner association says that this is an issue which needs to be worked out between me and the owner of the adjoining apartment. The owner of the adjoining apartment is a crotchety retired lawyer from Los Angeles. The apartment is currently occupied with a renter. The owner owns four units of the same apartment layout in the building. I really am reticent to deal with the owner because of his reputation.

I tried to contact the Nevada Ombudsman. They say they cannot help me. I then tried to contact a lawyer who wants a retainer of $5,000 before they will do anything and then said it will be more if the HOA wants to go into litigation. The repair is estimated to be approximately $500. So, a retainer of $5,000 with an open end seems ridiculous to me.

I have attached the email which I sent to the Ombudsman as well as the email I sent to the lawyer. This will provide background of the problem.

I am willing to do the work. And for that matter, I am willing to pay for the repair (within reason — $500 is perfectly acceptable to me).

I would like for the HOA to intercede on my behalf.

I interpret Nevada Revised Statutes 116 to indicate that the space between my apartment and the adjoining apartment is “common space.” The HOA is differentiating between “common space” and “public space.”

My question is: Is the HOA responsible for getting this issue resolved?

A: The space between your unit and your neighbor is not common space or public space. It is a shared space between the two units. It appears that the association has provided you with an accurate response that you will need to deal with your neighbor.

Q: I pay $158 per month in HOA fees. The company did not raise the fee last year. But we just found out that they are raising the fee by $18 per month to $176, starting Jan. 1. Is this amount of a raise legal? Please advise.

A: Under Nevada Revised Statutes 116.31073 (3c), any increase over 5 percent would require the vote of the membership at the budget ratification meeting. The proposed increase in your assessment is 11.4 percent, which would require voting to approve the budget with the higher assessment. Under NRS 116.31151 (3), members either ratify or reject the budget. Unless, at the meeting a majority of the owners or any larger vote specified in your governing documents reject the budget, the budget is ratified per state law whether or not a quorum is present.

Barbara Holland is an author and educator on real estate management. Questions may be sent to holland744o@gmail.com.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
New HOA president trys to set record straight

If the association followed the procedures as outlined by your governing documents, the amendment to change 10 lots to eight lots would be legal.

Homeowner says HOA assessments unfair

There are many associations where the homeowner assessment is the same for all units, regardless of size.

Removing board member may not stop the harassment

Ultimately removing this director from the board may be your final solution. One caveat, removing him from the board would not necessarily stop the harassment as he could continue to harass as a homeowner.

Homeowner vs HOA over backyard work

If the board was aware of the construction for over a year and never had taken any action against your friend, the board may find that they will have a legal issue in trying to enforce their regulations.

Condo renter parking motorcycle in unit

You have a couple of options. Try the management company, even if you have to make an appointment. Contact code enforcement with the county and see if they can assist you.

Homeowner complains about board, fee hike

To call for a special meeting of the homeowners, the owners must submit a petition signed by at least 10 percent or any lower percentage specified in the covenants, conditions and restrictions of the total number of voting members.

Law does not address online HOA meetings

There are many advantages and disadvantages of having a combination meeting — those present and those online. Until associations invest money to provide a better virtual system, homeowners can continue to expect various difficulties in hearing and seeing the participants at the board meetings.

Since COVID HOA refuses to hold regular meetings

The board has a legal obligation to hold meetings at least once every quarter and not less than once every 100 days per Nevada Revised Statute 116.31083.

Homeowner wants to recall entire HOA board

State law supports board members being removed with or without cause if a removal election is held and the number of votes cast in favor of removal constitutes at least 35 percent of the total number of voting members of the association and at least a majority of all votes cast in the removal election.