COMMENTARY: Ban kids from social media? Absolutely

Should the United States follow Australia’s lead in banning children under 16 from social media platforms? Absolutely.

Australia has set a new global standard by requiring platforms to act in children’s best interests. Its new law raises the minimum age to 16, requires age verification and holds platforms financially accountable for enforcement.

This isn’t a lifetime “ban.” It’s a delay that gives kids time to grow the emotional and cognitive skills needed to navigate one of the most powerful influences in their lives: social media. We already delay access to driving, gambling, alcohol and cigarettes because those activities come with serious risks that young people are not equipped to manage. Social media belongs in that same category.

Those in Big Tech have had decades to fix the harms that are hurting our kids, but they haven’t and they won’t — until they’re forced to.

Teens say social media feels like a trap, built to keep them scrolling, comparing and chasing validation. They talk about daily pressure from Snap Streaks, the pull of infinite scroll, the sting of bullying and the backlash when “private” disappearing messages or chats go public. Algorithm-driven rabbit holes make it only harder to escape.

Forty-five percent of teens say they spend too much time on social media. Twenty percent say social media is hurting their mental health or grades. They’re growing up in a world where their feeds are clogged with AI slop, clickbait and ads, and grown adults send unsolicited explicit photos. This is “normal” for them. They don’t know it could be different.

They need adults to set the standard, as we have done with other things that cause harm.

The U.S. surgeon general issued a 2023 advisory warning that kids spending more than three hours daily on social media face double the risk of mental health problems such as anxiety and depression. Typical teens spend 3.5 hours each day on social media, putting them squarely in the danger zone.

Social media companies say they care about safety, but their actions tell another story. Since 2022, platforms such as Meta, YouTube and X have gutted their trust and safety teams, laying off tens of thousands of employees responsible for building protections. They’re stripping away the safeguards parents assume exist when they hand a child a phone.

Meanwhile, parents are doing everything they can to keep up. They set timers. They try to monitor, to talk, to guide. They install apps and use parental controls, but in-app parental controls are clunky, easily bypassed and they don’t answer the question that keeps parents up at night: Is my child doing OK on social media?

No family should have to fight this battle alone, just like no family should have to individually regulate alcohol sales to minors. We don’t leave it up to parents. We create laws. We build guardrails. We hold industries accountable.

It’s time to do the same for Big Tech.

We must stop treating this as a private parenting problem and recognize it for what it is: a public health and safety crisis. Children deserve the chance to grow up with fewer pressures, less manipulation and more protection.

Delay social media. Our kids will thank us later.

Lisa Honold is the founder of the Center for Online Safety. She wrote this for InsideSources.com.