47°F
weather icon Clear

EDITORIAL: Jara is right: Open up union negotiations to taxpayers

We’ve criticized many of Jesus Jara’s proposals in the past, but the Clark County School District superintendent is dead-on when he advocates opening the collective bargaining process to increased scrutiny.

The district and the Clark County Education Association last month agreed to a new contract after months of acrimonious negotiations. The nine-month dispute ultimately ended up in the hands of an arbiter, who approved a deal.

Mr. Jara said recently he was relieved that the drawn-out process was over. He also said reforms are necessary to improve the process. “I think there’s a lot of changes that need to happen,” Mr. Jara offered. “We need to update laws.”

The local teachers union now advocates for overturning the Nevada statute banning public employees from striking. But that would be a nightmare for residents. Most government workers have a monopoly (law enforcement) or quasi-monopoly (teachers) on the services they provide. This means public-sector job actions — unlike those in the private sector — are strikes against the people and can be uniquely harmful by encouraging government employees to hold taxpayers hostage by walking off the job.

A good case can be made that public-sector collective bargaining should also be abolished and contract terms left to the legislative process. In many instances, the government officials serving as agents of the taxpayers are more closely aligned with union bosses than with those they’re paid to represent.

But Nevada law allows government unions to bargain collectively. Absent reforms, the answer is to make the process more transparent — conducting negotiations “in the sunshine,” as Mr. Jara put it — by allowing the taxpayers to observe bargaining sessions involving contracts for which they will be financially responsible. This would encourage compromise by pressuring public-sector union officials to be more realistic in their demands while forcing taxpayer representatives to take fiscal responsibility seriously.

Unfortunately, Nevada’s open meetings law exempts contract negotiations between state and local agencies and government unions. A 2020 poll conducted by the Nevada Policy Research Institute, a free-market think tank, found that 73 percent of Nevadans surveyed favored opening public-sector contract talks to the taxpayers. At least nine states already impose such a requirement.

The Democrats running the Legislature in Carson City will be disinclined to upset their government union benefactors. But Gov. Joe Lombardo, a Republican, should champion Mr. Jara’s suggestion and embrace legislation to expand the open meeting statute to include public-sector contract negotiations. Nevada taxpayers deserve transparency when it comes to oversight of the government contracts they are obligated to financially support.

MOST READ
In case you missed it
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
EDITORIAL: Trump should offer vision of hope, opportunuty

Mr. Trump is a divisive figure at a time of divisive politics, but he has an opportunity in his address to set forth a path forward of unity and respect without dwelling on past insults or affronts.

EDITORIAL: The hearings continue

The Senate began the show hearings for Donald Trump’s presidential Cabinet nominees this week. Many Democrats did not distinguish themselves.

EDITORIAL: Lombardo delivers solid, but uninspiring speech

Ronald Reagan once urged the Republican Party to broaden its appeal by “raising a banner of bold colors, no pale pastels.” Gov. Joe Lombardo doesn’t appear to be taking that advice.

EDITORIAL: Regulatory thicket will dog victims of California fires

If Gov. Newsom wants to facilitate reconstruction, he might also request technical help from those running states and municipalities who actually know how to encourage development rather than relying on those expert in killing it.

EDITORIAL: Billions for virtually nothing

As President Joe Biden shuffles off the stage this month, it’s worth taking a closer look at a claim that massive spending bills which triggered the inflation that helped bring down Democrats in November will pay large dividends in coming years

MORE STORIES