So let me get this straight. Nevada Question 3 will end Nevada’s Soviet-era energy monopoly and demand the creation of energy markets giving energy consumers the freedom to chose among all the different forms of energy available. Sounds good to me.
Then we have Nevada Question 6 that demands a Soviet-era requirement that 50 percent of the energy we Nevadans can chose from must be produced from renewable sources. How can the freedom of markets be a good thing on Question 3 and a bad thing on Question 6?
Right thinking Nevadans will let renewable energy stand on its own and compete fairly in the energy market without subsidies and without Big Government requirements.