42°F
weather icon Cloudy

LETTER: A tale of two fish

I didn’t realize Nevada fish were worth saving more than California fish.

On Page 10A of the Jan. 15 Review-Journal, an editorial criticized California, in part for not wanting to provide more water to its residents due to the harm it may cause various endangered species of fish.

Yet there on Page 1B in the same edition was a Review-Journal article stating that Nevada doesn’t want to provide more water in the Amargosa Valley for lithium mines due to the harm it may cause the Amargosa River pupfish.

It’s interesting how a state border can cause a 180-degree reversal in people’s opinions.

MOST READ
In case you missed it
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Mental atrophy?

Be careful with AI.

LETTER: A White House plan for Gaza

People refuse to see that Mr. Trump’s emphasis is, and always is, on Donald Trump.

LETTER: Police shootings story missed the mark

We should be celebrating the fact that so few Metro officers are found by juries to have exceeded their legal authorities.

MORE STORIES