weather icon Clear

LETTER: Biden wants it both ways

President Joe Biden invoking executive privilege to stop the release of the audio from special counsel Robert Hur’s interview comes as no surprise. Releasing this audio would clearly show that he is a seriously flawed candidate and should definitely not run for re-election.

If you remember, Mr. Hur concluded that Mr. Biden was a sympathetic, well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory, hardly the characteristics needed of a man running for president. I also was unaware that being elderly and having a poor memory were reasons for not being prosecuted. Almost instantly, the White House insisted that Mr. Biden was fully cognizant.

If so, then President Biden needs to be prosecuted for mishandling classified documents. If not, then the 25th Amendment needs to be applied, and this man needs to be removed from office.

You can’t have it both ways, Mr. Biden. It is just that simple.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
LETTER: Those dastardly mosquitoes

In the past month, I have shed my human identity and become a walking itch.

LETTER: The carbon-spewing Biden family

Climate change is an existential threat to mankind, animals and plants. Why doesn’t the Biden family lead the way?

LETTER: The Trump show trial

Remember, Martin Luther King, Mahatma Ghandi and Sir Thomas More — all innocent men — were also declared to be guilty.

LETTER: No conspiracy involving Hunter’s laptop

The R-J should acknowledge that Mr. Trump’s lies, frauds, defamations, criminal indictments and convictions are exponentially worse than Hunter’s laptop being evidence or any of the other alleged Biden missteps.

LETTER: Trump tries to win Nevada

Mr. Trump advocating for tax-free tip income is definitely one approach to winning Nevada. But my tip to Mr. Trump is to pick Marco Rubio and show the diversity of the GOP.

LETTER: Red Rock development ‘compromise’ is depressing

Red Rock Canyon is a fragile natural wonder. To claim that 3,500 homes and the traffic that goes with them, and changing the nature of the watershed, will not negatively impact the area is absurd.