weather icon Clear

LETTER: Pols should research gun violence before acting in haste

Well, 17 Democratic candidates for president were gathered in Iowa for a forum on gun control. Noble cause.

But I think their major thrust is to tighten up background checks, even though there’s insufficient evidence to show such “tightening up” will make a significant difference — even if they make checks universal and include all firearm transfers, not just those involving a licensed dealer.

According to analyses conducted in the RAND Gun Policy in America Project, only child-access prevention laws were verifiably “effective” for reducing firearm-caused death/injury, but only in children.

The study also found that data is inadequate to support a credible conclusion that background checks reduce firearm homicides.

Clearly, more research of gun violence incidents is required … and, perhaps, that’s where our politicians should be focused.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
LETTER: The Scott Gragson DUI case

After reading about the Scott Gragson DUI indictment, I can see that his attorneys must have gone to the Johnnie Cochran class on how to win every time.

LETTER: Trump steps in the same sinkhole

Isn’t there a pleasant (for Democrats) irony in President Donald Trump’s present difficulties?

LETTER: Fiddling while California burns

The fires burn in California and the whole story goes untold. Pacific Gas Electric has been punished into bankruptcy. Its customers are without power and still the place burns.

LETTER: The NBA’s false front

Thanks to Review-Journal sports columnist Ed Graney for his Oct. 12 column comparing the NBA and the WWE.

LETTER: Gun laws don’t work

From the day Cain killed Abel, no one has come up with a solution to stop one person from killing another.