51°F
weather icon Mostly Clear

LETTER: Time to ban wildlife killing contests in Nevada

After four failed attempts since 2015 to address mass wildlife killing contests around Nevada, the state wildlife commission created a contest committee, which first met in late September. No new information emerged after three hours, where the overwhelming speaker sentiment was to stop the bloodshed, supported by an additional 200 written public comments. A small number of hunting trade groups spoke for continuing the contests.

The photographic evidence of dead animals weighed to determine prizes, then stacked like firewood and disposed of as if they were yesterday’s trash, reflect poorly on the ethical hunting community. Awarding prizes for killing contests is a stain on our state’s reputation.

Ten other states have banned these horrific and dangerous animal safety contests. The Clark County Commission and the city of Reno overwhelmingly passed resolutions to terminate such contests.

The professional staff at the Wildlife Department have remained neutral and offer no input on the regressive biological impact of the mass removal of any wildlife species in a defined geographic area. Yet the public pays these staffers to provide technical guidance.

As a matter of public policy, why should we allow the mass slaughter of any wildlife species? Is this any different than condoning random mass shootings of innocent people by a deranged individual or group?

Before casting November votes, ask legislative candidates if they will abolish these contests during the 2025 Legislature.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: ‘Moderate’ Jacky Rosen ekes out a victory

She claimed in ads that she didn’t vote red or blue, that she votes vote for the betterment of all constituents. Let’s see if you really do.

LETTER: Order in the classroom

Even with a new interim superintendent and $281 million just for textbooks and supplies, Clark County students will not be learning as they could and should due to unruly classroom behavior.

LETTER: Instead of abortion, how about birth control?

It is mind-boggling that the most important issue some voters are concerned about is the ability of a mother to abort her unborn child.

LETTER: Why did Question 3 include ranked-choice?

I voted “yes” on Question 3, not for ranked-choice voting, but for a voice in the primary elections as an independent voter.

LETTER: Las Vegas is closed

We don’t need to build more housing for Californians.

LETTER: Reading is fundamental

When kids graduate from high school nowadays — if they graduate — they read at about a third-grade level and comprehension.

LETTERS: Democrats get what they deserved

The future looks bright again for the United States given that some competent people will be taking over for this present group of non-achievers.

MORE STORIES