UNLV professor’s prescription for ending gridlock in Washington is likely unworkable

UNLV professor David Orentlicher’s Sunday essay was interesting, but I found his ideas to be very unworkable (“Wedded to partisanship: Ending winner-take-all elections would encourage both sides to cooperate”). For starters, his model is Switzerland, a nation with about 8 million people. The United States has nearly 325 million inhabitants with constant pressures and social changes, while Switzerland is a small country with many universal social beliefs.

Although our founders had many different visions for our nation, they were able to make major compromises to form a fledgling union. It was not a perfect compromise and they had to “kick the can” of the slavery down the road for future generations, which is why we did have a Civil War.

We may have already traveled too far away from most — if not all — of the founders’ visions of having a government very close to the governed and therefore answerable to those they govern. Even Alexander Hamilton, maybe the strongest advocate for a strong centralized government, would likely be shocked at how much our centralized government has evolved and the massive power it has gained.

News Headlines
Local Spotlight
Home Front Page Footer Listing
You May Like

You May Like