79°F
weather icon Clear

Interactive handicapping corps started cold but is making progress

Updated September 21, 2017 - 6:10 pm

When strangers stop me on the street, they invariably ask me how many winners our interactive handicapping corps is picking.

Actually, no one but the police stops me on the street, and that’s a story for another day. I do, however, occasionally hear from readers wondering if we’re killing it at the windows and, if so, how they can get involved.

The “getting involved” part is easy. Simply go to the end of this piece and you’ll find details on how you can enlist in the Review-Journal’s #RJhorseracing handicapping group.

But, to answer the first question, let’s look at the first 17 races we’ve collectively handicapped and see what we can learn from the good, the bad and the ugly.

We’ll start with the ugly.

Out of 17 races, we correctly picked the winner only twice. That means if you blindly bet $2 to win on each of our selections, you’d be down $22.30 at this point.

A slightly more encouraging sign would be looking at our second choices, which won five times. Toss in two third-place finishers and you have nine winners from our top three picks out of 17. You would be down $17.20 if you bet our top three picks across the board in every race.

It’s not all bad news, though. Our collective choices seem to be getting better, with the group picking winning exactas each of the past two weeks, returning $28.40 and $21.60 on a $2 bet.

I’d like to think that’s partly because we’ve been tackling the toughest races possible on cards at eight racetracks, not counting Parx, the host of this week’s featured races. Those wide-open betting affairs at often unfamiliar tracks are great exercises to hone one’s handicapping skills.

I’ve also heard from group members who have cashed some nice bets in recent weeks by looking for value rather than blindly betting the horse that gets the most support, including last week’s second-choice winner, Harlan Punch ($14.00), and the previous week’s third-choice winner, Oscar Nominated ($9.40). That’s in keeping with our guiding philosophy that it’s not just about picking winners; it’s about getting amply rewarded when you do.

I’ll revisit our scorecard occasionally to update you on our progress and will come up with a solution to share the data with our group. Meantime, on to this week’s challenges.

#RJHorseracing featured races

This week we’re focusing on the signature events at Parx Racing (still Philadelphia Park to us old-timers): the Cotillion Stakes (G1) and Pennsylvania Derby (G1).

The races are a bit different from the wide-open affairs we’ve been targeting lately, as both have heavy favorites trained by Bob Baffert and ridden by Hall of Fame rider Mike Smith, or “Money Mike,” as he’s known to his legion of fans. Our handicappers foresee a big weekend for the California invaders.

In the Cotillion, the picking was heavily in favor of Abel Tasman (the 8-5 morning line favorite), with It Tiz Well (4-1) and Lockdown (8-1) filling out the placings.

And they make it a Baffert-Smith double by endorsing West Coast (8-5) in the Pennsylvania Derby over Irap (3-1) and Timeline (5-1).

“Tough to avoid the OBVIOUS FAVORITES this week,” sums up reader Robert Ranfone. “Awesome horses!”

I’ll climb out on a limb and pick Irap to upset West Coast. I thought he ran a winning race in the Travers Stakes when caught wide and the favorite likely won’t get away with dawdling fractions as he did that day.

In the Cotillion, I’ll concede Abel Tasman’s superiority.

You’re invited to get in on the action. Simply drop me an email or post on hop on Twitter (using the hashtag #RJhorseracing) to express your interest and you’ll get an alert on Wednesday when I post past performances for next week’s racing puzzles. We’re getting better, but we can still use your help!

Contact Mike Brunker mbrunker@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-4656. Follow @mike_brunker on Twitter.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
Brunker: Belmont winner can be found in bloodlines

This year’s Triple Crown has more closely resembled a revolving door than a series of horse races aimed at determining the best 3-year-old over a classic distance.