Why pay for the cow … when you’ve got Ralston?
If you hurry, click here on the Sun home page and witness an extraordinary display of anti-Sharron Angle advertising. The Sun's website is entirely wrapped in the anti-Angle ads.
Wasted dollars, if you ask me. The Sun itself is little more than a pro-Harry Reid, anti-Sharron Angle website. Why pay for an ad, when you get the same result in the "news" coverage?
The Sun's columnist Jon Ralston has yet to disclose his disqualifying conflicts in covering any politics in this election cycle. He "reports" unsourced info from inside the D camp, pretending like he's an objective "analyst" not in bed with them. Or, at least some of them.
Of course, the ads may be "comped." That would make more sense.
