89°F
weather icon Clear

High court on the air

Nevada's state Supreme Court announced Wednesday it will begin broadcasting all oral appeals arguments over the Internet.

"Webcasting of oral arguments will bring the Supreme Court closer to the people of Nevada," Chief Justice Jim Hardesty said. "Oral arguments are held in only the most important and legally complex cases."

The live video feeds will be found on the court's Web site: www.nvsuperemecourt.us, beginning with hearings tentatively scheduled for March 2 and 3 in Carson City.

To further enhance an understanding of the cases before the court, justices will begin posting synopses of the cases and legal issues to be argued, the chief justice said.

The court last June webcast oral arguments in a few high-profile cases involving election ballot challenges and the disciplinary proceedings for then-District Judge Elizabeth Halverson. In addition, the state high court has been posting on its Web site audio files, or podcasts, of past oral arguments since September 2007. The podcasts are kept on the Web site for about a month.

For the public to retain confidence in the courts and the justice they deliver, it's necessary for their proceedings to be open to the public, to the maximum extent compatible with order and dignity. In this day and age -- and particularly in a state like Nevada, where the voters live far-flung from the capital -- few citizens will ever have the opportunity to witness arguments before the court, in person.

Broadcasting over the Internet is a wise and sensible way to fill that gap. The court's initiative is to be commended.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
COMMENTARY: ‘Lived experience’: Is it right for you?

Every time some blowhard wants to identify as an expert and shut down all dissent, they appeal to their years of “lived experience.”

BYRON YORK: New York on the brink

Next year will bring the 25th anniversary of 9/11, and with it an irresistible angle for journalists and commentators.

EDITORIAL: When debate leads to death

Americans long ago decided to trade bullets for ballots. But this exchange isn’t the norm around the world — and isn’t inevitable here either.

LETTER: Liberals aren’t cheering Kirk’s killing

Victor Joecks’s Sept. 14 commentary on Charlie Kirk sadly embodies what is wrong with the headline “Why the left celebrates Kirk’s murder.”

LETTER: Kimmel off the mark

Misleading comments about the suspect.

MORE STORIES