Judge rules Gibbons can be questioned in woman’s lawsuit

RENO -- Gov. Jim Gibbons can be questioned by lawyers in a lawsuit filed by a former administrator who alleges she was improperly fired from the governor's office, a federal judge ruled Tuesday.

U.S. Magistrate Robert McQuaid said attorneys for Mary Keating will be allowed to take pretrial testimony from Gibbons and his budget director, Andrew Clinger, after the legislative session concludes.

"I think the governor gets deposed in this case at some point," McQuaid said.

Meanwhile, Gibbons told a Reno radio station on Tuesday he did not know Keating and had nothing to do with her transfer. He added that he "absolutely" plans to seek re-election to a second term next year.

McQuaid rejected arguments by Senior Deputy Attorney General Stephen Quinn that Gibbons should be insulated from giving a deposition unless Keating's lawyers can show the governor was involved in Keating's dismissal and the information they seek is unavailable from any other source.

McQuaid said he did not want to "hamstring" the plaintiffs by denying them a chance to "look the governor in the eye" and question him on allegations that Gibbons was behind Keating's firing in May because he thought she leaked details of private text-messages he sent to another woman on a state phone.

Gibbons later apologized for the more than 800 text messages and reimbursed the state $130.

Gibbons' lawyers in the attorney general's office said in court documents that Keating was fired because of "repeated rude and discourteous treatment of others."

Keating, a certified public accountant and 25-year state employee, has taken a job at another state agency for similar pay.

Gibbons said his role in the matter has been distorted by the media.

"I didn't know this person (Keating) from a bucket of apples," he told KKOH-radio on Tuesday. "I had nothing to do with her transfer."

Also on Tuesday, McQuaid deleted 10 lines from Keating's original complaint that refer to Gibbons' pending divorce from first lady Dawn Gibbons.

Quinn argued in court documents that the references were "immaterial, impertinent and scandalous" and only made for the purpose of "harassing and embarrassing the governor."

Keating's lawyers, Cal Dunlap and Monique Laxalt, argued that the material was relevant because it suggested a motive for retaliating against Keating.

Dawn Gibbons, who is represented by Dunlap in the divorce proceedings, has accused the governor of being involved with another woman, court records show.

McQuaid left other mentions of Gibbons' divorce proceedings in the complaint but struck portions concerning allegations of other women in his life.

The judge said that while the divorce itself might be material to the Keating case, "Why do you need the rest of that stuff in there? It doesn't add anything to the story."