69°F
weather icon Clear

Democratic stimulus

Say what you want about the Bush economic stimulus package, for the most part it at least centered on letting people keep more of what they earned in the first place so they could spend it as they pleased.

Will we be able to say the same about a future Democratic stimulus package? We're not optimstic.

On Tuesday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi hammered away at the president for the nation's struggling economy and revealed that Democrats have a number of additional "stimulus" measures in the works.

One of the plans involves -- for obvious political reasons -- attaching an unemployment benefits extension to a bill funding the Iraq war. Speaker Pelosi said she and House leaders are currently negotiating with the president on the issue.

But if he won't sign such legislation, "that would be in a second stimulus package," she said.

And what might that include?

Energy assistance for low-income families and other provisions, Bloomberg News reports.

So Speaker Pelosi's idea of stimulating the faltering economy includes more unemployment checks and handing out subsidies to help people in less-afluent households pay their electric bills.

In other words, more redistributionism and welfare.

What next, attacking high gasoline prices by imposing punitive new taxes on the industry and limiting our ability to develop domestic oil sources?

Oops.

Perhaps the "other provisions" to which Speaker Pelosi refers will include measures -- tax cuts and regulatory reform -- that might actually spur private-sector economic investment and create jobs.

But we doubt it.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
COMMENTARY: ‘Lived experience’: Is it right for you?

Every time some blowhard wants to identify as an expert and shut down all dissent, they appeal to their years of “lived experience.”

BYRON YORK: New York on the brink

Next year will bring the 25th anniversary of 9/11, and with it an irresistible angle for journalists and commentators.

EDITORIAL: When debate leads to death

Americans long ago decided to trade bullets for ballots. But this exchange isn’t the norm around the world — and isn’t inevitable here either.

LETTER: Liberals aren’t cheering Kirk’s killing

Victor Joecks’s Sept. 14 commentary on Charlie Kirk sadly embodies what is wrong with the headline “Why the left celebrates Kirk’s murder.”

LETTER: Kimmel off the mark

Misleading comments about the suspect.

MORE STORIES