43°F
weather icon Clear

Think Onion should live? Get a life

To the editor:

I see where the dog that killed a 1-year-old child was represented at the Nevada Supreme Court (“High court hears arguments over Onion,” Thursday Review-Journal).

What? The dog killed a baby. Dogs don’t comprehend right and wrong. Dogs don’t read and comply with the Nevada Revised Statutes. The dog that killed the baby, if spared euthanization, will not become “saved” or embrace religion. The dog won’t be rehabilitated to redeem itself with a future filled with acts of goodness. The dog killed once, and it shall kill or maim someone in the future.

The folks who have become so obsessed about the fate of this dog should get a life. I cannot understand why anyone would place a dog above a human, baby or adult. The court’s expenditure of taxpayers’ dollars to hear the case to save this dog is absurd.

When I see folks treat their dogs better than humans, I realize the human race is in decline. Our legislators have demonstrated that trait.

WAYNE P. BROTHERTON

AMARGOSA VALLEY

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: The graduation scam

Clark County School District numbers mean little.

LETTER: Holiday party pooper

Spin, exaggeration and political games from a Nevada congresswoman

LETTER: Free health care?

For low-income people, I agree with the concept of tax credits to help offset the cost of insurance premiums. However, I question the current eligibility requirement of four times the poverty level.

LETTER: Political folly on housing prices

These factors are why housing costs are a challenge. To expect the government to make housing affordable is a fool’s errand.

LETTER: A note to Mark Wahlberg

Let the film studios fund their own endeavors.

MORE STORIES