Rather than admitting their own role in igniting the Middle East, Biden and Harris now blame the victims of their own incendiary foreign policy.
Victor Davis Hanson
Victor Davis Hanson is a classicist and historian at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, and the author of “The Second World Wars: How the First Global Conflict Was Fought and Won,” from Basic Books. You can reach him by e-mailing authorvdh@gmail.com. His columns appears Sundays in the Review-Journal.
But why did Biden-Harris so foolishly ignite the Middle East?
At the end of the 2016 campaign, Hillary Clinton’s team leaked news of her purchased bogus “Steele Dossier” as supposed proof of Trump-Russian “collusion.”
Kamala Harris seems unwilling or unable to answer any impromptu question that she has not been previously prepped for.
The September 10th presidential debate went down as expected. Summed up, it was Sappy and the Blob pile on Grouchy.
The public is exhausted after a decade of chronic untruth from the left-wing and its media.
Until just recently, Democrats had considered an unpopular and enfeebled Joe Biden nonetheless far preferable to an incoherent, lightweight, and widely ridiculed potential replacement Kamala Harris.
This year is the most anti-democratic campaign ever.
Would the media prefer to help Harris win but lose further credibility themselves by failing to ask why she has disowned her past three decades of leftist agendas?
By selecting the hard-left Walz, Harris reminds the nation who runs the Democratic Party.
But she is a poor substitute for the successful bait-and-switch 2020 con of “ol’ Joe Biden,” the fake moderate “uniter” from Scranton.
And Democrats sanctimoniously lecture America that “democracy dies in darkness.”
Why not, at last, just let the people choose their own president?
Lessons from an earlier time. Zelensky might do well by studying the career of Mannerheim and how, with dignity, he saved Finland from the Russian meatgrinder.