Was Obama wrong then … or now?

I am genuinely curious to find out from Obama devotees whether he was wrong in 2007 when he said: “The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation,” or is he wrong now in unilaterally sending the military to attack Libya?

If Obama of 2007 is to be believed, he'd have to vote to impeach the Obama of 2011, wouldn't he?

Hey, I'm just askin', although I must admit I love seeing holier-that-thou liberals bend their conscience in a pinch. But, because my property is always to entertain rebuttal (even stupid rebuttal), you tell me, Obama defenders. How do you reconcile this?