65°F
weather icon Clear

Homeowner wants rental cap for new community

Q: (The builder) is in the process of completing (our development). They are adding 164 units in eight new buildings. We are concerned that investors will buy a significant number of these units and we will become overpopulated with renters.

I’m being told that laws have been changed, but there is no change to our covenants, conditions and restrictions to limit the number of rental units allowed.

A: Based on the six-month rental clause in your governing documents, there is no rental cap. You could have a significant number of renters. You would have to talk with the developer and see if they are willing to modify the CC&Rs to have a rental cap not to exceed 25 percent of the units.

Q:Our homeowners association is self-managed with 81 homeowners. I have lived here for 24 years. I have served on the board (six years), Landscape Committee, Architectural Control Committee and have done volunteer work in the common areas for years.

At one of the meetings I went to, in the open forum I said I have some concerns that our lawn service is ruining our common areas. We have plants dying from no water, etc.

The vice president at the time, who was running the meeting, had only been on the board for three meetings. They owned property but never lived here.

I said I was carrying water and maintaining the common area behind my house. The vice president spoke up and said, “I’m going to end this real quick. This is a warning: You are not allowed to work in the common areas without the board’s permission, if you continue to do so we will get an attorney and send you a cease and desist letter.”

I never did anything else, and three weeks later I was served a cease and desist letter. No hearing, no violation. This letter has been a thorn in my side for quite some time. I then wrote the board a letter requesting a hearing to clear my name. They told me I would have to put it on the agenda in an open meeting. A few months later they found out they were wrong. I then requested a hearing to have the letter rescinded.

The secretary at that time, who lives next door to me, came over and hand-delivered a letter to me. He said, “You are not going to like what they are going to offer you.” They made a decision without giving me a hearing.

The letter said they wanted to meet with me to tell me what they have decided. He then said they would not rescind the letter, but it would be a dead issue. I said no, that’s a slap in the face, because I did nothing wrong. He said he agreed with me and was glad I wasn’t going to meet with them.

Since then I have volunteered on a committee again. A new board member said that’s OK as long as she abides by the cease and desist letter.

I just wondered what my options are at this point to rid myself of this letter.

A: It is important that homeowners do not interfere with their vendors or take steps to fix problems in the common area. It would appear the board may have overreacted, as a warning letter could have been sent to you.

What actions you take from here depends upon the amount of time that you want to continue your differences with your association. Associations are not required to meet with homeowners when issuing courtesy or warning letters. If you were fined without a hearing that would have been a violation of the state law.

You do have the option of speaking with the Ombudsman Office to see if they want to become involved, although you may not obtain satisfaction. You may just want to drop the matter and move on as a committee member for your association.

Barbara Holland is an author and educator on real estate management. Questions may be sent to holland744o@gmail.com.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
Homeowner fights HOA board to get pergola

You raise the issue of fairness. The architectural guidelines should be clearly written as to the types of changes or variances that can be made in approving an application, especially those involving significant constructional modifications to the property.

Rules and deadlines for HOA boards to follow

A federal shutdown makes it illegal for a homeowner association to send pre-collection notices. intent to lien notices or any other collection notices to federal, tribal or state workers or related household members under Nevada Revised Statutes 116.311627.

NRED guidelines for deadlines for HOA boards

This is the third column in a four-part series that will present various topics and deadlines that are required by the Nevada Real Estate Division.

A look at deadlines for HOA meeting notices

This is the second column in a four-part series that will present various topics and deadlines that are required by the Nevada Real Estate Division. As managers and board members, please check your operating procedures to ensure that your policies and procedures are compliant.

A NRED deadline reminder to HOA board members

Over the coming weeks, my column will present the various topics and deadlines that are required by the Nevada Real Estate Division. As managers and board members, please check your operating procedures to ensure that your policies and procedures are compliant. The following information is provided is from the Nevada Real Estate Division with its permission.

Water District clarifies new grass restrictions

The original language of the law (AB 356, 2021) that prohibits using Colorado River to irrigate nonfunctional turf was amended under AB 220 in 2023. While it originally referenced properties not zoned exclusively for single-family residence, the amended language references “any parcel of property that is not used exclusively as a single-family residence” (Section 31).

HOA should release list of board candidates

Under NRS 116.31034, it is not required that an association provide a list of the candidates prior to the sending of the ballots. Often this information can be found in the meeting minutes as part of the election update. The board should release this information as it is not considered confidential.

HOA should disclose NRED settlement agreement

Since the association’s case with NRED is probably public information, your association should have reported the information to its members.

Law supports HOA rule that all dogs be on leash

In the State of Nevada and in Clark County, a service or support dog while in public is to be on a leash unless the leash interferes with the individual’s disabilities or with their work.

MORE STORIES