Official: Nevada might not qualify for federal stimulus education funds

CARSON CITY — Democratic legislative leaders said Wednesday they must spend at least $500 million more on education than Gov. Jim Gibbons proposes in his budget before the state can qualify for federal economic stimulus grants.

During a Senate-Assembly budget hearing, Assembly Speaker Barbara Buckley said Nevada won’t qualify for the stimulus money if the Legislature backs Gibbons’ plan to reduce teacher salaries by 6 percent.

“In order to qualify for the money we are going to have to change the governor’s proposal,” added Senate Majority Leader Steven Horsford, D-Las Vegas.

In a joint statement, the top Democrats said that higher education spending must be increased by $436 million and that $116 million must be added to the public school budget.

The Gibbons administration quickly challenged their statements and figures.

Gibbons’ communications director, Daniel Burns, accused the Democrats of using a “scare tactic” to make it sound like “we have to raise taxes to qualify” for stimulus funds.

“That is not the way it is,” he said. “All these numbers are subject to interpretation and our budget office is discussing them. Some of this stuff changes every day.”

He added that stimulus money might be freed up so Nevada can qualify for the grants without an additional outlay of state funds.

According to estimates, Nevada could receive $1.34 billion in federal economic stimulus funds once a bill already approved in the U.S. House of Representatives passes the U.S. Senate. That could be as early as Feb. 16.

“This is going to be quite a Herculean task,” Buckley said about sorting through the stimulus bill and finding additional state revenue.

So far Democratic leaders have not yet supported any increases in taxes, although Senate Taxation Chairman Bob Coffin, D-Las Vegas, said Tuesday that no business is immune from tax increases.

Gibbons’ two-year, $6.17 billion general fund budget is 9.3 percent below the $6.8 billion budget approved by legislators in 2007.

But Gibbons estimated the state would need to spend $8 billion to keep services at the level contemplated by legislators when they approved the current budget two years ago.

To cover that perceived shortfall, he has recommended the state cut salaries for state workers, teachers and university and community college employees by 6 percent and to reduce their health care benefits. He also recommends reducing state support to higher education by 36 percent, or $473 million.

Burns questioned how Buckley and Horsford are calculating a formula that would determine how much money Nevada must spend to qualify for funds. Under that formula, called “maintenance of effort,” the state does not receive grants if it spends less money on education than it did in a previous fiscal year. There is debate on which fiscal year that would be.

Both Horsford and Buckley said Nevada’s budget cannot reduce higher education and public school spending below 2007-08 fiscal year figures to qualify for funds.

But during his presentation to the committee, Vice Chancellor Dan Klaich said the fiscal year used in economic stimulus bill to calculate maintenance of effort is 2006-07. And in an interview, state Budget Director Andrew Clinger said it would be the 2005-06 fiscal year.

Klaich calculated that legislators must increase spending to the Higher Education System of Nevada by $276 million over the next two years to qualify for $509 million in state stabilization funds.

Buckley and Horsford, however, said the state needs to add far more — $436 million in all to the higher education budget to qualify for the funds.

Klaich acknowledged after the meeting that there are a lot of unknowns about the stimulus plan.

The House of Representatives last week passed its $819 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The Senate is now considering its version, which could bring the total plan to nearly $900 billion.

While he wants the federal funds, Horsford acknowledged if Nevada takes the money, the state will have committed itself to additional spending once federal funds stop coming in the 2010-11 fiscal year.

“We need to ensure that the funding is there once the stimulus is gone,” Horsford said. “But I have not heard from anyone in the private sector that we will get back to a 2007 economy anytime soon.”

Contact Capital Bureau Chief Ed Vogel at evogel@reviewjournal.com or 775-687-3901.