81°F
weather icon Clear

LETTER: Animal rights group now going after hunting

I was happy to read the Review-Journal editorial exposing the animal rights group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (“The PETA slaughterhouse,” March 13). There are others that should be exposed, including the International Fund for Animal Welfare, the Humane Society of the United States and Friends of Animals, just to name a few.

I would like to point out another aspect of these activist groups. They have become anti-hunting advocates. They pretend to be “conservation organizations” by soliciting donations “to save wildlife” while their funds go to lobbying on Capitol Hill to disrupt science-based wildlife management. They reject hunting on an emotional basis, targeting hunters with exaggerated, unwarranted and ignorant outrage with the real purpose of raising funds.

Their anti-hunting efforts stems from emotions and not reality. They shun science-based management programs that include hunting as the sustainable force, while reveling on any negativity that surfaces.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: How to bring about world peace

If President Donald Trump really wanted the warring to stop in the two current world hotspots and finally have peace, he would stop funding the efforts of Israel and Ukraine.

LETTER: A better way to collect tax dollars

Up until 1913, the federal government did just fine collecting excise taxes on domestic products and tariffs on foreign imports.

LETTER: Trump should try trade school

George Wills’ Sept. 4 commentary (“America has too many college students”) definitely hit the mark for me.

LETTER: Fears about Medicaid cuts are overblown

Single parents are not going to lose Medicaid — unless, of course, they are making substantial money and can afford to pay for health insurance for their children.

MORE STORIES