OPINION: Minimum wage hike means fewer jobs


On Thursday, labor-backed walkouts targeted fast-food outlets in Las Vegas and more than a dozen other major American cities from coast to coast. Workers are demanding a more than 100 percent increase in the minimum wage, to $15 an hour.

The protesters target their rhetoric at restaurant management. But this isn’t accurate. In reality, the employees on the picket lines are fighting a war with price-conscious customers. If they get their way with a $15 minimum wage, they will only hasten the service industry’s move toward automation and self-service, where the customer (or even a computer) performs a task that used to be part of an employee’s job description.

The labor-aligned protesters are butting up against some basic economic realities of the service industry. Fast-food restaurants, along with other labor-intensive businesses such as grocery stores, gas stations and retail outlets, keep just a few cents in profit from each sales dollar after paying for food, labor and other expenses. In other words, a $15 wage mandate — which would add more than $15,000 a year to the cost of each full-time, minimum-wage employee — can’t just be absorbed.

This leaves employers with one of two unpleasant options: Raise prices, or reduce costs. But higher prices to offset a wage hike of this magnitude aren’t realistic — imagine how you’d respond if the 99-cent menu became the $2.99 menu. Instead, restaurant operators have to provide the same service with fewer employees.

This means that customers end up serving themselves instead of being served by an employee. For example: Today, we might bag our own groceries at a supermarket checkout or pump our own gasoline at the station (except in New Jersey and Oregon, where it’s against the law). Even self-service soda refills at fast-food restaurants were developed as a labor-saving device.

In other cases, a robot can be “hired” to do the job instead of an employee. The technology is already here: San Francisco-based Momentum Machines recently announced a new robotic burger-flipper that does the work equivalent of three full-time kitchen employees. That’s 360 burgers per hour, with no strikes, benefits or wage demands.

At current labor costs, Momentum’s burger-flipper pays for itself within the first year. But at $15 an hour for an employee, the investment would pay off in a matter of months.

This trend toward automation doesn’t just affect the kitchen. In 2011, McDonald’s announced it was installing touch-screen ordering terminals at 7,000 European locations, where the minimum wage is higher, making the cashier position effectively obsolete. California Pizza Kitchen, Chevys Fresh Mex and other table-service chains are experimenting with computer terminals that let customers order and pay at the table, with minimal service from a server required.

These changes don’t become inevitable until the cost of service gets trumped by customers’ desire for low prices. But once the jobs are automated, that’s one fewer entry-level position for a less-skilled employee to work his or her way up the career ladder — no small concern given that teen unemployment has been above 20 percent for five years.

Those teens, along with other entry-level employees, will be the first to feel the unintended consequences of a $15 minimum wage. However well-meaning the striking employees are, the fact is that they’re only fighting the laws of economics — and that’s a fight they can’t win.

Michael Saltsman is the research director at the Employment Policies Institute.

 

Rules for posting comments

Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Stephens Media LLC or this newspaper. This is a public forum. Read our guidelines for posting. If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon next to the comment.