Feds will join push to stop sports bets in New Jersey
NEWARK, N.J. - The U.S. Department of Justice filed notice Tuesday that it is joining a lawsuit by sports leagues and the NCAA to stop the state from allowing sports gambling, setting the stage for a fight next month over the constitutionality of a 21-year-old federal statute.
Tuesday's filing was expected after a federal judge last month declined New Jersey's motion to dismiss the lawsuit filed by the National Football League, the National Hockey League, the National Basketball Association, Major League Baseball and the NCAA.
The state had argued that the leagues and the NCAA, college sports' governing body, couldn't prove they would be harmed if it allowed sports gambling since all enjoy unprecedented success despite the existence of legal wagering in Nevada and more widespread illegal sports gambling.
Now, the focus will turn to the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, a 1992 statute that prohibited sports gambling in all but four states: Nevada, where bettors can gamble on games individually; and Oregon, Montana and Delaware, which were allowed to offer multigame parlay betting.
Attorneys for New Jersey claim the law usurps state legislatures' authorities and treats the states unequally by grandfathering in some states where sports betting already was allowed.
The leagues' attorneys have termed the constitutional challenge "specious" and have argued that the Constitution's commerce clause doesn't require uniformity in its application to different states.
In Tuesday's filing, lawyers for the Department of Justice asked U.S. District Judge Michael Shipp to give them until the end of next week to file responses to the state's constitutional challenges. Oral arguments in the case are scheduled for Feb. 14 in Trenton.
The leagues and the NCAA sued last summer after Christie signed a law that would allow sports wagering at Atlantic City casinos and the state's horse racing tracks. Games involving New Jersey colleges or college games played in New Jersey would be exempted.
