68°F
weather icon Clear

Tabloid to fight Meghan Markle’s lawsuit on letter to dad

Updated October 2, 2019 - 4:57 am

LONDON — The Mail on Sunday newspaper says it will defend itself “vigorously” against a lawsuit brought by Prince Harry’s wife Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex.

The newspaper said Tuesday night it “stands by the story” in question, which concerns publication of a letter Meghan had written to her estranged father.

“Specifically, we categorically deny that the duchess’s letter was edited in any way that changed its meaning,” the tabloid said in a statement.

The royal’s civil lawsuit accuses the Mail on Sunday of copyright infringement, misuse of private information and violating the U.K’s data protection law with the “intrusive” publication of the letter, Schillings, the law firm handling the case, said.

Prince Harry accused the Mail on Sunday of editing the letter in “an intentionally destructive manner” to “manipulate” readers with an unflattering portrayal of his wife, who was the American actress known as Meghan Markle before the couple married in May 2018.

‘Life after lie’

In a long statement lambasting British tabloids more broadly, Harry said the lawsuit had “been many months in the making” following a “ruthless campaign” to smear Meghan by a “press pack that has vilified her almost daily” and created “lie after lie at her expense” during her maternity leave.

“I have been a silent witness to her private suffering for too long. To stand back and do nothing would be contrary to everything we believe in,” the prince said in the statement posted on the couple’s royal website.

“There is a human cost to this relentless propaganda, specifically when it is knowingly false and malicious, and though we have continued to put on a brave face - as so many of you can relate to - I cannot begin to describe how painful it has been,” Harry said.

Mail stands by story

A Mail on Sunday spokesman told Britain’s Press Association the paper “stands by the story it published and will be defending this case vigorously.

“Specifically, we categorically deny that the duchess’s letter was edited in any way that changed its meaning,” the spokesman said.

Harry has lashed out at British celebrity news coverage before. He lashed out at aggressive paparazzi that stalked Meghan’s every move when they were dating and offensive treatment of her biracial heritage by some media.

Mentions Diana

In Tuesday’s statement, he mentioned his late mother, Princess Diana, who died in an August 1997 car crash while being pursued by paparazzi, as the reason he knew the move to take a tabloid to court “may not be the safe one, it is the right one..

“Because my deepest fear is history repeating itself,” he said. “I’ve seen what happens when someone I love is commoditized to the point that they are no longer treated or seen as a real person.

Meghan and Harry are paying for the lawsuit with private and not public funds, the Press Association reported. The news agency said if damages are awarded to Meghan, they will be donated to a charity that combats bullying.

The lawsuit also names the Mail on Sunday’s parent company, Associated Newspapers.

Harry said the couple and their baby son, Archie, have received positive news coverage during their royal tour in southern Africa that demonstrated how Meghan has been subjected to press “bullying” back home.

“She is the same woman she was a year ago on our wedding day, just as she is the same woman you’ve seen on this Africa tour.”

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
Trump is open to regime change in Iran, after his administration said that wasn’t the goal

The Trump administration on Sunday sent a series of conflicting messages to Iran — with U.S. officials initially indicating a willingness to resume negotiations after a surprise attack on three of the country’s nuclear sites and President Donald Trump talking up the possibility of regime change.

 
Pentagon says U.S. doesn’t want to pursue war with Iran after bombing 3 of its nuclear sites

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Sunday that America “does not seek war” with Iran in the aftermath of a surprise attack overnight on three of that country’s nuclear sites while Vice President JD Vance said the strikes have given Tehran a renewed chance of negotiating with Washington.

Trump ignites debate on presidential authority with Iran strikes

The instant divisions in the U.S. Congress reflected an already swirling debate over the president’s ability to conduct such a consequential action on his own.

Nevada group criticizes Supreme Court ruling on gender care

The Supreme Court upheld Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming care for transgender minors, effectively protecting many state and federal efforts on transgender issues from legal challenges.

Israel and Iran launch new strikes even as diplomatic effort gets underway

President Donald Trump has been weighing whether to attack Iran by striking its well-defended Fordo uranium enrichment facility, which is buried under a mountain and widely considered to be out of reach of all but America’s “bunker-buster” bombs.

MORE STORIES