46°F
weather icon Partly Cloudy

LETTER: Judge plays politics with Trump trial date

The date for Donald Trump’s election interference trial has been set by U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan for March 4. Perfect. Of course a trial that would adjudicate an election interference case would be set at a time to interfere with an election. It makes perfect sense to a leftist judge with a severe blind spot, who without apology sees nothing wrong with that date. She knows it will interfere with campaigning and Super Tuesday voting and is no doubt gleeful that it will work out that way. These people are devious snakes.

Let’s keep in mind that the prosecution has turned over more than 1 million pages of documents to the Trump defense team.

This case is so blatantly partisan that it is nauseating. For Donald Trump to get a fair trial and be vindicated in that courtroom would be a miracle. I could, however, see that potentially happening because the scheming of the left often comes back to bite them.

So we will see who triumphs, the Trump defense team or the Chutkan election interference team.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Donald Trump’s histrionics

Are retired military and government personnel who criticize this administration now considered “seditionists”?

LETTER: Las Vegas and Oakland sports teams

We’ve already been burned once. I hope this Oakland team doesn’t turn out to be a bait and switch scheme.

LETTER: Universal mail ballot an invitation to fraud

Monday’s Review-Journal headline about the pending Supreme Court case on mail-in voting should be a call to action for all Nevadans and American citizens throughout the country.

LETTER: A story about grade inflation

Mike Obstgarten’s “Academic fraud: Grade inflation is a scourge that must be eradicated” reminded me of a midterm grade I received my first semester in college.

LETTER: American needs universal health care. Put it on the ballot

Universal health care has been debated in the US for more than 40 years, but it is never voted on because both parties accept campaign donations from the for-profit insurance companies to maintain the status quo.

MORE STORIES