85°F
weather icon Clear

LETTER: Taking Donald Trump seriously

I was taken aback by the following line in your July 31 editorial regarding the president’s suggestion that the November election be postponed. You write that “it’s hard to know whether to take this fusillade seriously or whether to treat it as just another effort by the man in the Oval Office to troll the gullible Resistance.”

This moderate conservative and former Republican would like to know where you draw the line between trying to get into the president’s head to determine if he should be taken seriously and risking being labeled as laughably “gullible” simply for taking him at his word? And when did your editorial board decide to condone, even mirthfully embrace, the notion of a U.S. president routinely trolling, baiting or otherwise toying with the American public?

While President Donald Trump is known to be a habitual liar, if we aren’t ever to believe he has any serious intentions, are we to just ignore his many rants, assertions and threats? Even as we witness him and his enablers often following through — or attempting to — with increasing boldness, chipping away at this country’s rule of law and undermining the Constitution?

To be sure, Mr. Trump is not a serious president. But to not take him seriously is at this country’s peril.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Does the punishment fit the crime?

A woman gets probation for pulling out a gun and firing shots at a group of individuals on the Strip? Insanity.

LETTER: Cops, firefighters pay for their benefits with shorter lifespans

You get way more than what you pay for when you’re talking about fire and police services in Las Vegas. I’m not sure you could say the same about the bang for your buck you get from local journalists.

LETTER: Sprawl is not the anwer for Las Vegas

Las Vegas, this is your chance to create affordable, mixed-income housing with common green space close to the amenities that make life easier for families.

LETTER: NV Energy’s sleight of hand

Energy companies change their rate structures for one reason: to increase their profits, not to make it better or less expensive for their average customer.

LETTER: Pointing a finger for the Badlands fiasco

Who should ultimately be responsible for the $285 million that Las Vegas had to pay the company EHB to settle the Badlands golf course litigation?

LETTER: New Vegas ad campaign a dud

If Kate Wik is so upset with four “negative” articles, she should return her six-figure bonus to taxpayers and resign.

MORE STORIES