weather icon Clear
RJ App
Vegas News, Alerts, ePaper

New HOA president trys to set record straight

Q: First, I want to say thank you for your weekly column. I read it each week and it has been very informative to me.

I was elected president of a small homeowners association in Las Vegas. The community is comprised of 10 lots, eight which have homes built on them. The two vacant lots are owned by two separate members of the community. The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions was filed with the Clark County Recorder by the original declarant (builder) February 2008. The association was registered with the Nevada Secretary of State in August of 2010.

In the preamble of the Declaration, it states: “The property consists of 10 lots for the residential community.” Article 1 — Definitions, Article 1.2 states: “Articles shall mean Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation, as such articles may be amended from time to time.” Article 1.3 — Annual Assessment, states: “Assessment shall mean a charge against a particular owner and his lot, representing a portion of the common expense, which are to be levied among all owners and their lots in the property in the manner and proportions provided herein.” Article 1.4 — Assessments. Special, states: “The assessment levied shall be levied among all the owners and their lots in the property in the same proportion as annual assessments.” Article 1.16, Declaration, states: “Declaration shall mean the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions, as it may be amended from time to time.”

In February 2012, it was presented and voted on by the members of the association to only levy the annual reserve assessment against the eight lots with existing homes. The amendment to the original declaration was drawn up and recorded with the Clark County Recorder February 12, 2012 by the original president of the HOA.

Fast forward to current time. I was elected president of the HOA in January of 2021, superseding the original president, mentioned above, that served from 2012 to 2021. He is not happy that the reserve assessment is levied against eight lots instead of 10. He is saying that the amendment that he originally recorded was illegal and should be reversed. I have read the declaration, which I have been told are our ruling documents, many times and can’t find anything that relates to this action being illegal. I do know that if the homeowners ask to put this issue on our meeting agenda, it could be voted on to either change it or keep it as it is. No one has done this to date.

I hope I have explained this so that the chain of events makes sense. I am hoping that you can give your opinion on this. Thank you.

A: If the association followed the procedures as outlined by your governing documents, the amendment to change 10 lots to eight lots would be legal. If the former president now states the amendment did not follow the proper procedures and is illegal, the former president would need to provide empirical information to support his claim.

As to placing the issue on the next board agenda, the homeowners would need to make this request in writing. Once it is on the agenda, the current board could take no action, especially if the former president cannot provide the information to show the amendment was not done according to your governing documents.

Barbara Holland, CPM is an author, educator, expert witness on real estate issues pertaining to management and brokerage. Questions may be sent to holland744o@gmail.com

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
New law helps protect homeowners’ private information

In addition to imposing cybersecurity insurance and data protection requirements for homeowners associations’ online assessment payment processors, SB378, which was adopted this session and went into law earlier this year, helps HOA protect homeowners’ private information and streamlines the email notification process.

New law improves online protections for homeowners

Pursuant to SB 378, that was adopted this session and went into law earlier this year, entities processing homeowner payment transactions are now required to maintain a minimum of $5 million dollars in cyber-security insurance “that provides coverage for losses arising out of or relating to data breaches, unauthorized intrusions into an information system, computer viruses, ransomware, identity theft and similar exposures.”

HOAs can buy flood insurance but it’s expensive

Is it possible for the HOA to purchase flood insurance for the complex even though it is not in a high-risk flood zone?

New law will allow HOA electronic voting for elections, recalls

Assembly Bill 309 allows HOAs to utilize electronic voting for elections and recalls. It also allows HOAs to use autopay and opens the door to development of new management transition requirements.

Homeowners say HOA is doing things right

The board is striving to keep this a nice place to live, where our now grown kids enjoy coming back with theirs for visits.

HOAs not required to carry flood insurance

You can contact the Regional Flood Control District that can tell you if your home is in a designated flood zone.

Homeowner says HOA doesn’t communicate well

First, there should be no issue for the management company to inform you as to the checklist that is used by the inspector.

Homeowners can meet to air concerns about HOA

Homeowners do have the right to meet to discuss their concerns about their association. Unlike board meetings which have to be disclosed to the membership, this group can have private undisclosed meetings.

Columnist Barbara Holland celebrates 25 years of HOA QA

For over 25 years, Holland dedicated her time and expertise to Las Vegas homeowners’s concern through her column, which is published on Sunday in the Las Vegas Review-Journal’s real estate section.