Bundy testifies carrying guns let larger message get out
The leader of a 41-day standoff at a national wildlife refuge in Oregon testified Wednesday that he orchestrated the takeover to take “a hard stand” against the federal government’s control of public lands and said the occupiers would not be successful unless they carried guns.
October 5, 2016 - 10:38 pm
PORTLAND, Ore. — The leader of a 41-day standoff at a national wildlife refuge in Oregon testified Wednesday that he orchestrated the takeover to take “a hard stand” against the federal government’s control of public lands and said the occupiers would not be successful unless they carried guns.
Ammon Bundy’s two days of testimony have taken jurors from his family’s high-profile 2014 standoff with federal agents in Nevada to this winter’s occupation of Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. Bundy asserted the Nevada standoff triggered the activism that led him to Oregon.
Though U.S. District Judge Anna Brown has tried to keep jurors focused on the criminal charges, Bundy repeatedly has tried to use the platform to amplify his message that Western states must win more control over vast federal land holdings.
Bundy, 41, is among seven people accused of conspiring to impede federal workers from doing their jobs at the refuge during the occupation. Four, including Bundy, also are charged with possessing a gun in a federal facility. If convicted, they face years in prison.
Bundy said he did not conspire with anyone in the weeks before the Jan. 2 occupation. That morning, he met a group at a restaurant and suggested they take it over during a rally supporting two ranchers set to return to prison for arson.
“I proposed to them that we go into the refuge, and we basically take possession of it, and we give these lands back to the people,” Bundy said.
He said he wasn’t armed on the refuge but acknowledged telling others to carry guns. Otherwise, the occupation had no chance of success, he said.
“Without the guns, they would have come out in a paddy wagon and put us in zip-tie handcuffs,” Bundy said. “We would never have been able to tell people why we were there.”
Bundy testified that interfering with federal workers was never a consideration. He wanted to generate media coverage of the treatment of Dwight and Steven Hammond, father-and-son ranchers convicted of setting fire to public land, and his belief that the U.S. Constitution gives the federal government very limited right to own land within a state.
“This issue is the issue,” Bundy told the judge when she tried to limit his testimony about the Constitution. “This is why we went onto the refuge and did what we did.”
Bundy maintains he tried legally to keep the Hammonds out of prison before deciding he had no choice but to take what he repeatedly called a “hard stand.”
Prosecutors contend the conspiracy began two months before the occupation, when Bundy met an Oregon sheriff on Nov. 5 to discuss the plight of the Hammonds. Bundy said that was not true.
He testified that a police official helped ease tensions during a 2014 standoff with federal agents at his father, Cliven Bundy’s Nevada ranch. The federal agents tried to round up the elder Bundy’s cattle but backed off as they faced a large armed group.
A video played for jurors showed the police official appearing to broker the deal that allowed Cliven Bundy’s cattle to go free.
Ammon Bundy said that official protected his family, and he figured Harney County Sheriff Dave Ward in Oregon would do the same for the Hammonds. But he said the discussion with Ward got no results, and neither did his efforts to contact elected officials.
Bundy also discussed how his religious faith played a role in his decision to help the ranchers. The judge, however, stopped him from reading Scripture on the stand.
After the jury left for its lunch break, Bundy co-defendant Neil Wampler stood to applaud, saying, “We all love you Ammon. Thank you so much for what you’re doing.
Bundy will take the stand again Thursday.