weather icon Clear

Schneider agrees to $150,000 payment to Tarkanian

Members of Nevada’s political class are reconsidering the potential cost of careless, negative campaign rhetoric after a state senator agreed to pay a vanquished foe $150,000 to settle a legal battle over claims a jury found crossed the line from free speech to defamation and libel.

On Monday the attorney for former candidate Danny Tarkanian said Sen. Mike Schneider, D-Las Vegas, agreed to pay his client the settlement as the result of a jury verdict late Friday in the civil case.

Tarkanian attorney Gus Flangas says he didn’t ask the jury to impose new limits on free speech, but sought justice for harm that the false claims did to his client.

“The bottom line on this would be that if you are going to make allegations of a serious nature, you need to be truthful,” Flangas said Monday. “Spin can become a false statement. That might be the message that comes out of this. Don’t cross that line.”

Flangas described the terms of the settlement; the court document was not yet available.

The agreement was reached before the phase of the trial to determine punitive damages was to begin Monday morning. Late Friday, a jury found Schneider guilty and awarded $50,000 in damages.

Flangas said the punitive phase could have seen Tarkanian awarded as much as $300,000. Each side has agreed to pay its own legal costs.

In a prepared statement, Schneider said, “I was very disappointed with the jury’s verdict in the Tarkanian case against me. I believe this decision will have devastating ramifications on future campaigns and a chilling effect on free speech in general.
“I am fairly confident we would have reversed the decision at the Supreme Court. However, this matter has been a five-year ordeal and it was time to put it to rest.”

During a brief phone interview Schneider also said the $150,000, which includes the $50,000 jury award, would be paid through a personal insurance policy.

The case dates back to the 2004 election cycle when Tarkanian, running as a Republican in a heavily Democratic district in Las Vegas, was the subject of harsh claims in fliers and on television that suggested an association with subjects of a telemarketing scam that victimized elderly people.

Tarkanian, the resident agent for several telemarketing companies that were indicted on fraud charges, said he did legal work on behalf of the firms but knew nothing of the fraud. Schneider also said Tarkanian assisted prosecutors to save himself.
Schneider won the election, only to lose the subsequent civil lawsuit stemming from the negative claims.

Tarkanian, the son of legendary former UNLV basketball coach Jerry Tarkanian and Las Vegas City Councilwoman Lois Tarkanian, said he plans to again run for public office.

“I am a viable candidate now that this has come through,” he said.

“From all indications, we’ve broken new ground here,” said retired state archivist Guy Rocha, who polled several historian colleagues and said none recalled a dispute between candidates over campaign rhetoric going as far, legally speaking, as the Tarkanian case against Schneider.

“I was a little bit surprised that the jury fell for it,” said David Damore, a political science professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. “Generally there is a really, really high bar for that kind of stuff in an election.”

Damore said the nastiest campaign rhetoric typically comes from “shadowy groups” that aren’t officially associated with candidates, making it tough to hold anyone accountable for outlandish statements.

The Tarkanian case could make official campaign workers even more skittish about associating with outside groups.
As local political movers got wind of the decision on Monday, they said it could influence future campaign decisions.

“I think this, in the long run, will teach people to just make sure their research is correct,” said Grant Hewitt, campaign manager for former Nevada Sen. Joe Heck, a Republican now running for governor.

“I do a lot of research before I encourage any campaign I’m a part of to go forward on anything,” Hewitt said.

As recently as his most recent campaign last fall, which he lost to now-Sen. Shirley Breeden, D-Henderson, Heck was the target of mailers stating he was indifferent to women with cancer and blamed cancer victims for their disease.

The mailers were from the Democratic Party, not Breeden.

Former Sen. Bob Beers says he wishes the verdict would have come sooner because it might have helped him last fall.
Beers was the subject of mailers last fall that falsely claimed he was “Under Ethics Commission Review!!!”.

Beers sued his opponent, Allison Copening, and the Nevada Democratic Party.

Beers said the court dropped Copening from the suit, but that it was still pending against the party.

“Had this decision been rendered prior to the last campaign season, I would probably still be a senator,” Beers said. “Just like Mr. Tarkanian, I am seeking to have the record set straight.”

Beers wasn’t the only one with whom the Tarkanian case struck a chord.

“It absolutely does put people who campaign like that on alert,” said Bryon Geddes, campaign manager for former North Las Vegas Mayor Mike Montandon, another Republican candidate for governor.

Geddes said the case won’t affect Montandon’s campaign because “we don’t plan strategy built on negativity” toward opponents.

David Cohen, campaign manager for Clark County Commissioner Rory Reid, a Democratic candidate for governor, says the case is a good reminder that sloppy research or thoughtless claims can come back to bite a candidate.

“Part of why we spend time preparing so carefully is because we think that it is important to be factually correct,” Cohen said. “There are always campaigns that really push the boundaries of truth. They should be held accountable in every way, but most importantly by voters.”

Political consultant Pete Ernaut of R&R Partners couldn’t recall a campaign rhetoric dispute that went as far as the one between Tarkanian and Schneider.

“I’ve certainly heard of a number of cases where it has been threatened, but I’ve never seen one come to judgment and to penalty,” said Ernaut, who has worked with former Gov. Kenny Guinn and current Sen. John Ensign.

Like the other political professionals, Ernaut said the situation was a reminder of the importance to back words with facts and to cite original sources of claims.

“Political speech in campaigns should, and often does, push the edge of the envelope by its nature,” Ernaut said. “I’m not sure this case changes any standard, because the standard has always been truth.”

Contact reporter Benjamin Spillman at bspillman@reviewjournal.com or 702-477-3861.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
HHS says abortion restrictions effective immediately

Planned Parenthood and other family-planning providers are suing the Trump administration to overturn the regulations.