WASHINGTON — The Democratic-led Senate on Wednesday rejected a budget-slashing House spending bill as too draconian. It then killed a rival Democratic plan that was derided by moderate Democrats as too timid in its drive to cut day-to-day agency budgets.
The votes to scuttle the competing measures were designed to prompt progress. The idea was to show Tea Party-backed GOP conservatives in the House that they need to pare back their budget-cutting ambitions while at the same time demonstrating to Democratic liberals that they need to budge, too.
White House budget director Jacob Lew said that the votes should turn a page and that talks between the administration and Republicans are likely to become more productive.
“We want to come to a reasonable outcome,” Lew said in an interview. “We’ve made it clear that that’s not the end, that there are more savings. But we’ve also said that there’s a line beyond which we can’t go.”
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., voted against the House-passed budget cut bill.
Reid called it a “nonstarter” that would cost 700,000 jobs and cut several programs that are accessed by Nevadans including Head Start, community health centers and Pell Grants for college tuition.
Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., voted for the bill, but he said he did so reluctantly because it did not go far enough.
Ensign said in a speech that the $61 billion in spending cuts in the GOP bill was “paltry” compared with the $1.6 trillion the government is spending this year.
“So when are we going to get spending under control?” he said.
Reid voted for the Democratic alternative, saying it was more responsible. Ensign voted against it, saying it was not a serious effort to cut spending and “virtually ignores the deficit.”
One member of the Senate Democratic leadership had a positive spin.
“It isn’t often that two failed votes in the Senate could be called a breakthrough,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said in a speech at the liberal Center for American Progress think tank. “Once it is plain that both parties’ opening bids in this budget debate are nonstarters, we can finally get serious about sitting down and narrowing the huge gap that exists between the two sides.”
Schumer, with other top Senate Democrats, visited with Obama on Wednesday afternoon to plot strategy. The senator declined to comment afterward, other than to say he recognizes his party will have to move in the GOP’s direction.
One reason is that Democratic moderates are agitating for further cuts.
“I still think there are way too many people in denial around here about the nature of the problem and how serious it is,” said Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., who contended that the Democratic plan didn’t go far enough. But she said the GOP measure cut too indiscriminately in its funding for infrastructure programs, education and research.
The GOP plan mustered 44 aye votes. The Democratic measure received 42 votes, with 10 party members and liberal independent Bernard Sanders in opposition. Moderates Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., Ben Nelson, D-Neb., Bill Nelson, D-Fla., and McCaskill were among those opposed to the Democratic version.
At issue was legislation to fund the day-to-day operating budgets of every federal agency through the Sept. 30 end of the budget year and provide a
$158 billion infusion for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Republicans controlling the House, driven by a campaign promise to bring return domestic agency budgets to 2008, pushed through last month a measure cutting more than $60 billion, imposing cuts of 13 percent, on average, to domestic agencies.
The 87-member freshman class forced Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, to back away from an earlier plan cutting
$35 billion over the second half of the budget year that took into account the fact that the budget year is nearly half over. Over the coming six months, the House measure would impose day-to-day cuts far steeper than promised in the campaign. Targets grew to include Head Start, special education and Pell Grants for low-income college students.
The Senate Democrats’ alternative, unveiled Friday by Appropriations Committee Chairman Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii, cuts about $12 billion below levels enacted for 2010. It’s also $30 billion below a Senate omnibus spending measure that Republicans sidetracked in December.
Inouye said his bill represented months of labor by panel members and their aides and “makes real cuts to real programs.”
“But the cuts … are based on hearings, testimony and a thorough analysis of the current needs of every agency and department,” Inouye said. “By contrast, the Republicans in the House have thrown together a proposal … based on the campaign promise to reduce spending by $100 billion.”
Inouye was referring to a GOP campaign promise to cut nonsecurity spending by $100 billion below President Barack Obama’s budget request.
Stephens Washington Bureau Chief Steve Tetreault contributed to this report.