66°F
weather icon Cloudy

Collective bargaining isn’t the problem — a lack of support for education in Nevada is the issue

The Review-Journal is bashing one of its favorite whipping boys again, collective bargaining for public employees, claiming that reform is needed at the next legislative session (Thursday editorial). There is plenty of reform needed, especially when it comes to education in Nevada. However, the collective bargaining and binding arbitration that resulted in me, as a teacher, receiving only one-quarter of the raise I was promised this year is not the reform needed.

I have been a teacher in Clark County for 12 years. I began this school year without a contract, the fifth time that has happened to me. That means I have gone into five different school years on a salary freeze, not knowing if my agreed upon, contracted raise will be honored. This year, I will not receive my raise until after the school year. So the district paid me less all school year than it had agreed to pay me.

Going on strike as a teacher in Nevada is against the law. We aren’t allowed to join our comrades in Oklahoma and West Virginia in walking off the job to demand that our profession and our field be given the funds it deserves. Instead, we go through collective bargaining and binding arbitration — not our first choice. I think it would be much more effective to go on strike and show the state how vital teachers are.

The Review-Journal should focus on the real issue: The lack of importance people assign to education in our state. We don’t fund education at levels that show we care. We are facing a teaching shortage here in part because of this lack of support. But I know that won’t happen, because as your own reporter even pointed out in a March 24 column comparing education in Nevada and other states, “I wonder whether the differences are more attributable to a single factor: appreciation for education. By legislators, community members, students and even the media.”

In my 12 years of living here, the Review-Journal has consistently shown a disdain for public education in Nevada.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Film tax subsidies and other Nevada handouts

Review-Journal columnist Victor Joecks calls Nevada’s film tax credits “for suckers.” Maybe so, but if that’s true, there are a lot of other suckers sitting at the same table.

LETTER: NYC mayoral election signals trouble

History teaches us that the average age of the world’s greatest civilizations is about 200 years. So with our republic now going on about 250 years, perhaps there is reason for concern that we may be overdue for the end.

LETTER: So Aaron Ford wants to be governor?

So Attorney General Aaron Ford wants to be our next governor. What has he accomplished as our attorney general?

LETTER: A tribute to our veterans

Saints walk among us. Those who earned a Medal of Honor, Bronze Star, Silver Star or Purple Heart because they valued someone else’s life more than their own.

LETTER: Bill Gates and climate change

Victor Joecks’ critique of Bill Gates’ climate memo grossly misrepresents Mr. Gates’ position and oversimplifies the complex challenges of global climate policy

MORE STORIES