85°F
weather icon Clear

Legal marijuana and the threat of civil forfeiture

I just don’t understand why current marijuana dispensaries profits are not allowed to be banked for fear of forfeiture.

Marijuana is classified as a Schedule 1 substance by the federal government, as are opioids and several other drugs that are available at your nearest pharmacy. The profit made from these narcotics can be banked with no fear of forfeiture.

I am not a pot smoker and I don’t work in the pot industry. But fair is fair and this is just wrong. Someone needs to wake up President Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: How Las Vegas needs to reinvent itself

Las Vegas appears to be subjected to the perfect storm for tourism. Domestic tourists pretty much know the price of things.

LETTER: You can really see Nevada’s education failures

We have had one of the lowest-ranked school systems in the country for a number of years. Those unprepared children pass up from grade to grade and eventually matriculate into general society.

LETTER: Not all aboard with this train move

I am alarmed by the proposal to transfer the Nevada History Museum in Ely and its buildings to the Nevada Northern Railway Foundation Inc.

LETTER: The business opportunity Nevada needs

Nevada lawmakers passed on the opportunity to diversity our economy beyond gaming and hospitality by energizing a new film industry investment.

LETTER: What Las Vegas should do to win back tourists

The resort fees add, in many cases, a considerable amount to a room cost, and yet many tourists are not here to use the facilities those fees supposedly cover.

LETTER: Defunding the police was folly

We should realize how ignorant it was to get votes by defunding the police.

LETTER: Lombardo’s leadership shines

I did not vote for Gov. Lombardo for him to be someone’s press secretary.

LETTER: Warrants remain a must

As usual, your recent editorial (“Fourth Amendment protections on the line case,” Aug. 25) was on the correct side of the facts of this Fourth Amendment case.

MORE STORIES