89°F
weather icon Clear

LETTER: A tale of two fish

I didn’t realize Nevada fish were worth saving more than California fish.

On Page 10A of the Jan. 15 Review-Journal, an editorial criticized California, in part for not wanting to provide more water to its residents due to the harm it may cause various endangered species of fish.

Yet there on Page 1B in the same edition was a Review-Journal article stating that Nevada doesn’t want to provide more water in the Amargosa Valley for lithium mines due to the harm it may cause the Amargosa River pupfish.

It’s interesting how a state border can cause a 180-degree reversal in people’s opinions.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: The missing piece

Aces struggle without Plum.

COMMENTARY: Managing expectations around summer vacation

The mood of family members, combined with the fast pace of modern-day living, has left parents wishing they had more quality time with their children.

LETTER: Fluff from the rich

Big beautiful bill buries the downtrodden.

MORE STORIES