84°F
weather icon Clear

LETTER: Ballot question would cap attorney fees in some cases

I have been a lawyer for close to 70 years and was in private practice for more than 40 years. I have never practiced personal injury law, but I have many friends who did so. As your article on a proposed ballot question to limit attorney fees mentions, a contingent fee lawyer advances all the costs related to the case. There are no charged fees, no retainer fee and no monthly billing of the client. Of course, at the initial phase, the lawyer decides whether to accept the representation.

I believe that contingent fees are proper and the percentage thereof should depend on whether there is a settlement or a trial. Depending on the results of a trial, the lawyer (and client) could get nothing. If the trial goes the other way, I believe that the percentage should be no more than 35 percent upon a successful trial or 25 percent for a settlement. The proposed 20 percent is too low. I also believe that the percentage is a matter of agreement between the client and the lawyer, even though some jurisdictions have placed limits.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: New Neon section is a winner

Thank you so much for restoring the Neon entertainment section to its formal fullness.

LETTER: Trump had no mandate for Los Angeles raids

Trump thinks winning the election means doing whatever he wants. He and the GOP are purposely exacerbating this, like he always does.

LETTER: Policy-making as a blood sport

Will the United States fall into a totalitarian government that exerts total control, or be a representative democracy that listens to the voices of “we, the people”?

MORE STORIES