48°F
weather icon Clear

LETTER: Donald Trump’s U.S. Supreme Court pick, Neil Gorsuch, would be a disaster for the environment

Imagine that the year is 2037. The world’s water supply is dropping abysmally low, causing war among countries for water rights; marine species are becoming extinct due to high ocean temperatures; warmer-than-normal winds, traveling from the Southern hemisphere, are mixing violently with the Northern cold winds, unleashing countless high-level tornadoes.

If Judge Neil Gorsuch is placed on the U.S. Supreme Court, this image could become a reality because of his anti-environment stance. The world — nor future generations — cannot afford such immoral people on the bench of a court that impacts the whole planet.

In 1984, the U.S. Supreme court voted on the correct side of the law in the Chevron decision, which blocked judges from second-guessing rulings from respected entities such as the Environmental Protection Agency. Judge Gorsuch argued against this environment-friendly ruling, saying that the ruling overstepped boundaries. His opinion reflects a salient truth: He values big business over the environment.

We would be moving backward, not forward, as far as environmental progress goes. Therefore, his nomination must be stopped.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Putin and peace

The United States should go to the top of the hill and ask Russia to pull out its troops, return all land (plus Crimea) it invaded while killing innocent people and make reparations for the destruction it brought to Ukraine.

LETTER: The loss of the penny

I suggest that the change from every sales tax transaction ending with one, two, three or four cents — those pennies that we will not see — be delegated to go toward our national debt.

LETTER: The graduation scam

Clark County School District numbers mean little.

MORE STORIES