92°F
weather icon Clear

LETTER: Female candidates don’t have to be perfect

I’d like to offer an independent voter’s comments regarding Susan Estrich’s Tuesday commentary, “Why must a female candidate be perfect?”

Ms. Estrich’s premise regarding Sen. Elizabeth Warren is wrong. A candidate needs to be “likable,” not perfect — and Warren is anything but likable. She is crass, brash and rude. Ms. Estrich should remember that Hillary Clinton was smug, curt and unlikeable — hence, she lost.

I recommend Ms. Estrich scramble her female candidate viewpoints and preface them with “likability” first. Then maybe she’ll have a cogent argument regarding female candidates instead of an outmoded point of view.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Iran racing to build the bomb?

Iran’s rulers are not coming to the table to make peace. They’re coming to buy time.

LETTER: Don’t ignore the Constitution

Usually, Victor Davis Hanson backs up his comments with supportive information. This was not the case in his June 15 commentary, “The rogue’s gallery.”

LETTER: Nevada needs to get serious about DUI

Nothing better illustrates our city and county approach to felony DUI than a case in which a man killed an innocent young girl and her dog and was convicted of that crime.

LETTER: Invading Greenland?

We are being government by people who aren’t giving it much thought.

MORE STORIES