Two recent Review-Journal headlines: “A pitch for turf removal” and “LV buying frenzy.” What connects, rather does not connect, both articles? Water. The first report deals with water conservation, and the second story does not mention the need for water for these additional new housing developments. Do politicians and/or authorizing/licensing agencies ever look at an entire picture?
Interest rates, greedy developers are the main issue.
The dating app of choice.
For low-income people, I agree with the concept of tax credits to help offset the cost of insurance premiums. However, I question the current eligibility requirement of four times the poverty level.
These factors are why housing costs are a challenge. To expect the government to make housing affordable is a fool’s errand.
Why should the citizens of this county have to pay such compensation when they, too, were injured?
