67°F
weather icon Clear

LETTER: The nature of science is to be progressive

In response to Jonah Goldberg’s Wednesday column, “The science of intellectual tribalism”:

It is the job of scientists and scholars of every kind to push knowledge forward and reject the traditional thinking in their fields of study. Therefore, it is the nature of science to be progressive — and this is exactly why people who are educated in the universities of the world are progressive.

You cannot have modern medicine, the MRI, the computer, the internet and men in space or robots without people who think about what is not known instead of holding on only to what is known.

Individual scientists may be conservative financially and many may be socially conservative, but none of those who are successful are intellectually conservative. Anti-intellectualism gets us nowhere and being anti-progressive gets us nowhere. If David Gelernter, Trump’s potential pick for science advisor, is anti-intellectual, then he is exactly the wrong person for the job.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: A major pet peeve

Dogs in restaurants and grocery stores? Where are the health inspectors?

LETTER: Fraud in Minnesota

Don’t make blanket assumptions about the entire Somali community.

LETTER: Trump pardoning drug dealers

For those of you who may think President Donald Trump is altruistic in his battles against drug trafficking, think again.

LETTER: Putin and peace

The United States should go to the top of the hill and ask Russia to pull out its troops, return all land (plus Crimea) it invaded while killing innocent people and make reparations for the destruction it brought to Ukraine.

LETTER: The loss of the penny

I suggest that the change from every sales tax transaction ending with one, two, three or four cents — those pennies that we will not see — be delegated to go toward our national debt.

MORE STORIES