56°F
weather icon Clear

LETTER: Those deceptive ads about Question 3

I read with dismay the Review-Journal’s recent editorial on Question 3. I had no idea that Question 3 actually represented “ranked-choice” voting. The TV ads sure put a different spin on it, talking only about open primaries. I think there should have been advertising to refute those ads and explain the real damage that would be done if Question 3 passes.

I don’t think the measure would win the popular vote if people really understood what it was all about. As it stands, I’m afraid the friendly, clean-cut people on television touting the benefit of voting “yes” will have no trouble winning the battle.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: A note to Mark Wahlberg

Let the film studios fund their own endeavors.

LETTER: Too close to residential

Battery energy storage system plan poses a threat to northwest Las Vegas.

LETTER: Donald Trump’s histrionics

Are retired military and government personnel who criticize this administration now considered “seditionists”?

LETTER: Las Vegas and Oakland sports teams

We’ve already been burned once. I hope this Oakland team doesn’t turn out to be a bait and switch scheme.

LETTER: Universal mail ballot an invitation to fraud

Monday’s Review-Journal headline about the pending Supreme Court case on mail-in voting should be a call to action for all Nevadans and American citizens throughout the country.

LETTER: A story about grade inflation

Mike Obstgarten’s “Academic fraud: Grade inflation is a scourge that must be eradicated” reminded me of a midterm grade I received my first semester in college.

MORE STORIES