96°F
weather icon Clear

Presumption of innocence doesn’t apply to Brett Kavanaugh allegations

Review-Journal cartoonist Michael Ramirez and syndicated cartoonist Steve Kelley imply the consideration of an unproven accusation against Judge Brett Kavanaugh violates the presumption of innocence principle. Presumption of innocence applies to criminal proceedings, and no one — to my knowledge — has instituted such a proceeding.

Almost all of the information used to judged nominees for the Supreme Court (as well as for other positions) has not been proven in court. While I do not know if the accusation against him is valid, I believe it should be taken seriously, researched and evaluated. It shouldn’t be swept under the rug in a rush to get the nomination done before the next election.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Lombardo’s invitro veto makes sense

Gov. Joe Lombardo’s veto of the invitro fertilization bill was a fair move considering it would apply only to all groups with 51-plus employees except those who work for the state or school district.

LETTER: Iran racing to build the bomb?

Iran’s rulers are not coming to the table to make peace. They’re coming to buy time.

LETTER: Don’t ignore the Constitution

Usually, Victor Davis Hanson backs up his comments with supportive information. This was not the case in his June 15 commentary, “The rogue’s gallery.”

LETTER: Nevada needs to get serious about DUI

Nothing better illustrates our city and county approach to felony DUI than a case in which a man killed an innocent young girl and her dog and was convicted of that crime.

MORE STORIES