49°F
weather icon Mostly Clear

Ruben Kihuen doesn’t deserve to lose his House seat over a single allegation

I’ve never voted for Rep. Ruben Kihuen and probably never would. Nonetheless, allegations of sexual harassment made against him and reported in the Saturday Review-Journal do not, in my opinion, rise to the level of a forced resignation (“Tidal wave hits Kihuen”).

According to a former campaign worker, “Samantha,” Rep. Kihuen asked her out on dates and might have made a pass at her, causing her to feel “uncomfortable.” There is no accusation of sexual assault, no allegation of coercion or threats, no secret button locking victims in an office and no exposure — in fact, nothing much more than a single young man flirting with a young woman he found attractive. None of us really knows the details without corroboration. But if that’s all there is, for goodness sake, let’s all grow up.

Today we are told to consider any instance of a reportedly uncomfortable or awkward encounter as grounds for a career-ending public shaming of the “offender.” Let me say from experience, far worse things happen in the workplace than asking someone for a date or making a sexual flirtation. Sure, it’s sometimes inappropriate, but is it worthy of such exaggerated reactions? This case is not rape, sexual assault or intimidation a la Harvey Weinstein, Matt Lauer and other such monsters. If it were, I’d applaud Rep. Kihuen’s ever-so-sanctimonious Democrat colleagues suddenly calling for his head.

I’d love to see Rep. Kihuen lose his congressional seat at the polls, but not because of an unsubstantiated accusation as minor as this one. Have we taken leave of our collective senses?

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: The graduation scam

Clark County School District numbers mean little.

LETTER: Holiday party pooper

Spin, exaggeration and political games from a Nevada congresswoman

LETTER: Free health care?

For low-income people, I agree with the concept of tax credits to help offset the cost of insurance premiums. However, I question the current eligibility requirement of four times the poverty level.

LETTER: Political folly on housing prices

These factors are why housing costs are a challenge. To expect the government to make housing affordable is a fool’s errand.

LETTER: A note to Mark Wahlberg

Let the film studios fund their own endeavors.

MORE STORIES