ad-fullscreen
section-ads_high_impact_1

Two-week delay won’t change the issues surrounding North Las Vegas Constable Robert Eliason

Rarely have so many labored so hard to save just one person.

North Las Vegas Constable Robert Eliason remains firmly ensconced in his elected job, despite failing to get the required certification from the Police Officer Standards and Training Commission. Although state law clearly says he should have forfeited the position in July 2016, the commission has yet to act.

And on Wednesday, commissioners were at pains to find reasons why.

Commissioner Marilyn Kirkpatrick, a former Assembly speaker, said she wrote the law in question. The intent wasn’t for a constable who acted only as an administrator to get certified; rather, he or she would hire POST-certified deputies who would carry out evictions and serve court papers.

But Eliason has already admitted to the Review-Journal’s Michael Scott Davidson that he works in the field (with a weapon) performing constable duties. Even Kirkpatrick acknowledged such a person should be POST-certified.

Kirkpatrick added that she told Eliason to go to Carson City in 2017 — months after the final deadline for certification — to see if the law could be changed. The result — a bill that in most iterations would have exempted Eliason — never passed.

That means, whatever the intent of the original legislation, lawmakers had the opportunity to change the statutes but declined.

Commissioner Chris Giunchigliani noted Eliason was elected. She argued that the county was being asked to undo an election. But the voters undoubtedly believed Eliason would follow the law and get certified. (For his part, the constable told commissioners he was able to pass every element of the physical test save for one.)

But Giunchigliani’s reasoning falls short. The commission isn’t throwing Eliason out, the law is. The county’s only role is appointing his replacement.

Giunchigliani raised the legitimate issue of whether the county should close the constable’s office entirely, and turn the duties over to Metro police’s civil division, as was done with the Las Vegas Township constable. She also asked whether the county could grant Eliason a waiver (no, said county counsel Mary-Anne Miller) or if the Americans with Disabilities Act applied (again, no, Miller said).

In fact, Miller shot down every rationalization that would have allowed Eliason to stay in office, a much different stance than she took last year. Then, she said an unspecified legal proceeding was pending, and she encouraged commissioners not to act.

Appointed Commissoner Jim Gibson, sitting in his first meeting, cited that delay as a justification for further pause. “We’ve gone on all this time,” he said, “I don’t see … a compelling reason, why we have to act today.”

No reason, at all — aside from a clear state statute, the advice of legal counsel and his duty as a commissioner to uphold the laws of the state of Nevada, which he’d just sworn an oath to do.

Any delay works to Eliason’s advantage. It may not solve his POST problem, but it could solve a PERS problem: Public Employees Retirement System benefits are calculated based upon a person’s highest consecutive 36 months of salary. Eliason earns $103,438 as constable, much more than his highest North Las Vegas City Council salary, which was $41,826.

So far, Eliason’s been in office for 2½ years.

There was no shortage of support for Eliason at the meeting, from family members, friends and North Las Vegas officials. Commissioner Lawrence Weekly told him, “I have your back and I support you 100 percent.” Assistant County Manager Jeff Wells testified Eliason had done a good job managing the office.

But none of that is relevant to the central issue: Does Eliason meet the essential qualifications for the office under state law? The answer to that is no. At the end of Wednesday’s meeting, only Commissioners Larry Brown and Steve Sisolak seemed to get that. “Our hands are tied,” Sisolak said. “I just don’t see the flexibility.”

The commission voted 6-1 (with Sisolak in dissent) to delay making a decision for two weeks, in the hopes Eliason could find some way to appeal. Perhaps in two weeks, with literally every other option exhausted, the commission will have no choice but to follow the law.

Contact Steve Sebelius at SSebelius@reviewjournal.com or 702-387-5276. Follow @SteveSebelius on Twitter.

section-ads_high_impact_4
TOP NEWS
News Headlines
pos-2 — ads_infeed_1
post-4 — ads_infeed_2
Local Spotlight
high_impact_5
Home Front Page Footer Listing
Circular
You May Like

You May Like